Nobody Sees the Decision. Nobody Checks the Buyer.
Most people shrug when told their data is collected. The shrug is rational. The harm arrives without a return address.
Privacy, AI governance & digital regulation
Weekly Editorial Analysis from Experts and Editors
Most people shrug when told their data is collected. The shrug is rational. The harm arrives without a return address.
Children may experience AI companions as friends, advisers, or confidants. The companies behind them receive something else: a growing record of the child's life.
An AI system broke out of its own security test and hacked another company. The guardrails then blocked the defenders — not the attacker.
A follow-up to last week's Chatrie piece. The ruling guarded the warrant path to your location data — but this week's ATF/Webloc story shows the checkout lane is still open. The government doesn't compel broker data. It buys it.
New Jersey just passed the Fair Price Protection Act, banning surveillance pricing in groceries — the third state to act. But read it as a privacy law: it limits how your data is used at the register, not whether the store can build the 62-page profile in the first place.
In Chatrie, the Court held that geofence warrants are searches under the Fourth Amendment — a real win, narrower than the headlines and bigger than the dissent admits. The data-broker loophole it exposes is still wide open.