PrivacySignal
News

LAPD lets contract with surveillance giant Flock expire, citing ‘serious concerns’ over civil liberties and privacy

TechCrunch — Privacy · · International · Surveillance & Civil Liberties

The Los Angeles Police Department has allowed its contract with Flock Safety, a major automated license plate reader company, to lapse after citing serious civil liberties and privacy concerns. LAPD had been one of Flock's largest government clients.

Why this matters: When one of the biggest police departments in the country walks away from a surveillance contract and says civil liberties out loud as the reason, that is worth paying attention to. Flock's license plate readers do not just clock speeders. They build a running record of where cars go, which means where people go. That data does not disappear. It gets stored, shared, and sometimes misused. LAPD dropping Flock does not end this technology. But it signals that even large departments feel pressure to justify what they are collecting and why.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

This summary is AI-assisted and may contain errors. It is an original briefing to help you gauge significance quickly — not a reproduction of the source. Always read the linked original before relying on it. See our methodology.

Analysis

All analysis →

Weekly Editorial Analysis from Experts and Editors

Related stories

News
A ABC News & Headlines – Australian Broadcasting Corporation · · International

How could facial recognition technology differ from CCTV?

How could facial recognition technology differ from CCTV? ABC News & Headlines – Australian Broadcasting Corporation

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#surveillance#privacy Read original →
News
EFF — Deeplinks · · International

EFF's Policy Position on ALPR Surveillance: Eliminate It and Reduce Its Harms

Automated license plate readers (ALPRs) build a searchable map of everywhere a driver goes, fed into databases that police, ICE, and private vendors can query after the fact. Networked across a city, ALPRs are purpose-built to track everyone regardless of suspicion. ALPRs are not a surveillance tool that can be made safe with the right policy or feature update—they are irredeemably harmful. EFF's position is that ALPR mass surveillance—the indiscriminate, continuous collection and retention of location data on every driver, regardless of suspicion—should not exist. Because it nonetheless does…

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#surveillance#privacy Read original →