The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
474 results · page 10 of 20
A report from ABC Australia examines how facial recognition technology differs from conventional CCTV surveillance, pointing to distinctions in how each system identifies and tracks individuals in public spaces.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has published a formal policy position calling for the elimination of automated license plate reader mass surveillance, arguing that ALPR systems are structurally harmful and cannot be made acceptable through regulation or technical fixes.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has criticized a settlement involving Meta, arguing that while it restricts young users' access to Meta products, it also mandates age verification across all products — requiring more data collection from everyone, not just minors.
Who should care: Cybersecurity · Privacy officers · Administrators · Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Baby monitor companies like Nanit are deploying AI-powered cameras to track infants' speech, motor skills, and development around the clock. Nanit recently raised $50 million to expand this continuous health surveillance and extend it into early adolescence.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
A town has deployed facial recognition technology for the first time, marking a new use of the surveillance tool at the local government level. No further details about the location, scope, or purpose of the deployment are available from the source.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A bipartisan group of lawmakers is pushing the Commerce Department to finalize export control rules that would block Americans from helping foreign intelligence services acquire cyber tools, surveillance technology, and AI capabilities. The current regulatory gap, they argue, leaves civilian spy agencies able to obtain U.S. assistance with few restrictions.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Police deployed live facial recognition technology at The Lexicon, a shopping centre in Bracknell. The surveillance operation scanned people in a public retail space in real time.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
The Trump administration has walked back an earlier directive to hospitals requiring participation in a federal injury surveillance system, now telling them the program is voluntary. The shift follows reporting that revealed earlier correspondence had characterized hospital participation as mandatory.
Who should care: Healthcare professionals · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Flock Safety, a surveillance technology company that sells license plate readers and other monitoring tools to law enforcement and private communities, has grown rapidly with strong venture capital backing. The company is now facing scrutiny over how its data collection practices intersect with privacy rights.
Who should care: General readers · Privacy officers · Policy
The Center for Democracy and Technology has joined a coalition letter urging the Senate Judiciary and Homeland Security committees to close what advocates call the data broker loophole, a gap in law that allows brokers to sell personal data without the restrictions that apply to other surveillance methods.
Who should care: General readers · Privacy officers · Policy
Greater Manchester Police deployed live facial recognition technology at the city's Caribbean Carnival, according to reports. The surveillance system scanned attendees in real time at the public cultural event.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A coalition of civil liberties organizations, including EFF and Big Brother Watch, has written to Nottinghamshire Police urging the force to stop its planned rollout of live facial recognition technology in public spaces. The letter outlines six specific concerns about the surveillance system.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Police in Scotland are calling for legal powers to compel people to remove face coverings before any wider rollout of facial recognition technology, according to Scottish Legal News. The request signals law enforcement's intent to close gaps that could limit the effectiveness of the surveillance tool.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A piece examining the spread of Flock Safety license plate cameras prompts broader questions about how much public surveillance Americans are actually willing to accept, even as polls show widespread discomfort with being watched.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Tata Consultancy Services has deployed an employee surveillance tool that is drawing scrutiny over data privacy risks. The tool's scope and the data it collects from workers have prompted concern among privacy observers.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Workplace surveillance is expanding, and experts are advising employees to familiarize themselves with the monitoring tools their employers may be using. The Associated Press coverage signals growing public attention to how broadly this tracking now reaches.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Scotland's chief police inspector has voiced support for accelerating the adoption of facial recognition technology and AI tools within Scottish policing. The statement signals growing institutional pressure to expand biometric surveillance capabilities in Scotland.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Workplace surveillance is expanding, and experts are advising workers to understand the monitoring tools employers may be using. The story points to growing interest in helping employees recognize how they are being watched on the job.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
The Scottish Football Supporters Association has issued a public statement opposing facial recognition technology and mass surveillance, signaling growing pushback from civil society groups against biometric monitoring in public and sporting spaces.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
The Combating Organized Retail Crime Act passed a significant House vote and is moving toward the Senate, with proponents arguing it also addresses cybercrime. Critics have raised concerns that the bill could enable surveillance on a broad and potentially dangerous scale.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
EPIC and the Consumer Federation of America have released a new public resource explaining surveillance pricing — the practice of using personal data to set individualized prices — and related data-driven pricing methods.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Law enforcement is deploying mobile live facial recognition vans in a town in Buckinghamshire, England, bringing real-time biometric surveillance technology to a public street setting.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Communities that successfully pushed out Flock Safety's license plate reader cameras are discovering the surveillance did not stop — cities simply switched to different vendors or kept the original cameras running. Activists in Longmont, Colorado won a contract fight against Flock only to see a new company step in with the same technology.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A community event in Greenville is being organized around the topics of mass surveillance and privacy concerns, according to a local news report. No further details about the event's organizers, format, or specific focus areas are available from the published excerpt.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy