The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
642 results · page 10 of 27
Federal agencies hold broad legal authority to compel the production of sensitive personal information without a warrant or any showing of probable cause. A legal analysis argues that Fourth Amendment doctrine has not kept pace with the scope of these administrative subpoena powers.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity
Australian supermarket giants Coles and Woolworths are reportedly testing facial recognition technology in their stores as a measure to combat retail crime. The trials place both chains among a growing number of retailers experimenting with biometric surveillance in consumer spaces.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
West Yorkshire Police deployed facial recognition cameras in Kirklees for the first time, marking the technology's debut in that area. The rollout represents a continued expansion of live facial recognition by UK law enforcement.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A privacy commission has issued a caution to retailers that are piloting or testing facial recognition technology in their stores. The warning signals regulatory concern about how the technology is being deployed in consumer-facing environments.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A member of parliament has raised concerns about the Egyptian government collecting facial recognition data from residents. The nature and scale of the program, and the context prompting the MP's statement, were not detailed in available reporting.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Police in Khanna, Punjab, India have reportedly used facial recognition technology to identify suspects, marking what local sources describe as a first for the state's law enforcement.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A Guardian opinion piece, illustrated by First Dog on the Moon, takes a satirical look at the push to deploy facial recognition technology widely in retail settings as a response to shoplifting concerns.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Sainsbury's staff removed an innocent shopper from one of its stores after a facial recognition system incorrectly flagged them as a person of concern, marking at least a second known incident of this kind at the UK supermarket chain.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Major supermarket chains in Australia are reported to be looking into using facial recognition technology in their stores. No specific implementation details or timelines have been disclosed.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Meta has filed a patent related to its smart glasses that involves facial recognition technology, reviving concerns about real-time identification capabilities built into consumer wearables.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Australia's two largest supermarket chains, Coles and Woolworths, are trialing facial recognition technology in their stores, citing an increase in retail crime as the driver.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Australia's two dominant supermarket chains, Coles and Woolworths, are testing facial recognition technology in their stores. Details about the scope, purpose, or stage of the trials are limited, but the testing has drawn enough attention to be reported by national broadcaster ABC News.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A third gay bar in San Francisco has suspended its use of facial recognition technology following privacy concerns. The pause reflects growing pushback against biometric surveillance in LGBTQ+ spaces in the city.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has pulled back a $125 million sole-source contract it had planned to award to Thomson Reuters for surveillance data services. The withdrawal ends, at least for now, a deal that would have bypassed the competitive bidding process.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A campaign called 'Ban the Scan' is gaining traction in opposition to facial recognition technology used at Madison Square Garden. The push reflects growing public and political pressure to restrict how private venues deploy biometric surveillance on the people who attend their events.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Pressure is growing to restrict or ban the facial recognition and surveillance systems used by Madison Square Garden, which critics have described as a surveillance empire operating inside a major public venue.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Federal agents deployed facial recognition technology to identify and compile photographs of protesters during Operation Metro Surge, according to reporting by FOX 9 Minneapolis-St. Paul.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Privacy advocates staged a rally outside Madison Square Garden to demand a ban on facial recognition technology at the venue. The protest reflects growing public pushback against the use of biometric surveillance in privately owned public spaces.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
New York lawmakers have introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of facial recognition technology at Madison Square Garden, the major entertainment and sports venue in Manhattan.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Erie County asked businesses to disclose their use of biometric technology under a local law, and received only a small number of responses. The low turnout suggests limited compliance or awareness among the businesses covered by the requirement.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Protesters gathered outside Madison Square Garden to demonstrate against the venue's use of facial recognition technology, calling for it to be banned. The rally reflects growing public pushback against biometric surveillance at major entertainment and sports venues.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
The Premier League is providing funding to London police to deploy facial recognition technology at football matches. The arrangement represents a private sports organization directly financing law enforcement surveillance infrastructure.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A coalition of Democratic-led states has filed suit to block the Department of Homeland Security from accessing a commercial driver's license database, arguing the demand is part of a coordinated push to build mass surveillance infrastructure.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
India's Supreme Court has agreed to examine a legal challenge to the use of facial recognition technology at protests. The case puts the country's highest court at the center of a dispute over biometric surveillance of people exercising the right to public assembly.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy