The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
312 results · page 12 of 13
A new project aims to map the AI policy ecosystem marketplace.org
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
Our views on AI policy and political advocacy OpenAI
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
Experts say AI firm’s engagement with Vatican risks creating ‘feelgood’ discourse that lacks critical examination Why did Anthropic’s founder sit beside the pope during a warning about AI? In the first major written teaching of his papacy, Pope Leo XIV took artificial intelligence to task. The pontiff delineated the technology’s most concerning threats to humanity: replacing workers, accelerating war and exploiting the environment. At a ceremony honoring the holy teaching the day of its release at the Vatican, the pope was flanked by an unusual guest speaker: Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah,…
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
Building a future where innovation and inclusion are in step: Kevin Frazier on bridging the AI abyss. The Fulcrum
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
The consortium will focus on AI innovation and adoption, with six task groups concentrating on different aspects of AI measurement science and evaluation.
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
AI tools and data privacy: A University of Utah primer The University of Utah
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
AI Ethics and Regulation: How Investors Can Navigate the Maze AllianceBernstein
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
How Anthropic used AI ethics slop to play the pope and eclipse OpenAI bloodinthemachine.com
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
The World Is Trying to Govern AI. The UN Wants In. Council on Foreign Relations
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
The Coalition for Health AI (CHAI) has published new governance guidance aimed at helping health systems manage artificial intelligence responsibly, addressing oversight frameworks for AI deployment in clinical and administrative settings.
Why this matters: Health AI systems handle exceptionally sensitive personal data; governance standards that lack strong patient transparency and consent provisions could normalize broad data use with limited individual recourse or awareness.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Notes from the IAPP Canada: AI strategy, lawful access and more IAPP
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
The AI governance imperative you can’t afford to ignore cio.com
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
EU AI Act Update: Timeline Relief, Targeted Simplification, and New Prohibitions Inside Global Tech
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
Notable AI, privacy bills hit finish line in Illinois, Connecticut and New York IAPP
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
Notes from the Asia-Pacific region: China issues new AI ethics guidelines, Hong Kong conducts compliance checks IAPP
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
I draw the old way – with my hand. Doing it with AI would not make me more creative, it would drain the colour out of my existence Last week I went to a gig by myself for the first time. I sat myself down in my single seat, possibly the youngest person in the room and one of thousands excited to see Split Enz. I loved it – I felt joy and heartache as the lyrics spoke of human experiences, really lived. I happily realised that I did not have to wonder whether Split Enz had used AI in their work (as I so often do nowadays) as these bangers were created long before it was even dreamed of. As a v…
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
Privacy programs can't see AI connectors and that's creating a new insider threat IAPP
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
A piece published via the IAPP examines how dominant AI governance frameworks may be poorly suited to countries outside the Western regulatory sphere, raising questions about whether those models adequately address the diverse legal, cultural, and institutional contexts found elsewhere in the world.
Why this matters: Governance frameworks that don't translate across contexts can leave individuals in non-Western countries with weaker protections against algorithmic harm, surveillance, and data misuse — effectively creating a two-tier system of rights depending on where a person lives.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
Generative AI and privacy: the PIPC and the CNIL jointly produced a poster to raise awareness among AI users about data protection CNIL
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy · Privacy officers
Canada's Privacy Commissioner delivered remarks at the Venice Privacy Symposium, offering the office's position on AI governance frameworks. The intervention signals active engagement by a major national privacy authority in shaping international norms around artificial intelligence.
Why this matters: How regulators frame AI governance at international forums can directly influence individuals' rights over automated decision-making and data use. A privacy-centered voice in these discussions may help anchor emerging global standards around personal autonomy rather than purely commercial or security interests.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
President Trump scrapped a planned provision requiring government safety reviews of new AI models just before signing an executive order on artificial intelligence, reversing course after apparent industry pressure. The administration signaled it will prioritize AI deployment speed over pre-release oversight.
Why this matters: Removing mandatory safety reviews reduces a key checkpoint where harms to individuals — including surveillance capabilities, biometric systems, or discriminatory automation — might be caught before public deployment, leaving affected people with fewer protections and less recourse.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
A view from DC: A two-sided market of AI deception IAPP
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
The Federal Trade Commission will require Cox Media Group (CMG) and two smaller marketing firms to pay a total of $930,000 to settle allegations they deceived customers by falsely claiming to offer an AI-powered service that could target localized ads based on conversations captured from consumers’ smart devices and that consumers had opted into such targeting. In three separate complaints, the FTC alleged that Georgia-based media and marketing company CMG Media Corporation, which does business as Cox Media Group, and two marketing firms it worked with, New Hampshire-based MindSift LLC and Wi…
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
The OECD's AI policy arm has published guidance aimed at establishing common frameworks for AI security, addressing threats such as prompt injection, model poisoning, and the risks posed by autonomous AI agents in deployment environments.
Why this matters: How AI security baselines are defined at an international level will shape what protections exist against manipulated or compromised systems that increasingly mediate access to personal data and make consequential decisions about individuals.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy