The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
788 results · page 16 of 33
Congressional Democrats are pushing for swift federal AI regulation while Republicans are calling for a more measured approach, reflecting a partisan divide over how and how fast the government should act on artificial intelligence policy.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Countries across the Asia-Pacific region are taking meaningfully different approaches to regulating artificial intelligence, with no single framework emerging as the regional standard.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine has stated that regulation of artificial intelligence should be handled at the federal level rather than by individual states.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
President Trump has dismissed concerns about AI risks as a 'hoax,' a stance that is dampening expectations on Wall Street for any near-term federal AI regulation. The signal from the White House suggests the current administration has little appetite for oversight of the industry.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Vice President Vance addressed House Republicans in a speech that promoted AI development but did not include any discussion of regulatory frameworks or oversight for the technology.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Senator Bernie Sanders has called for meaningful public participation in the process of regulating artificial intelligence, arguing that ordinary people should have a voice in shaping AI policy.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A conference on AI regulation brought together lawmakers, industry figures, and other stakeholders to discuss policy directions for artificial intelligence. The event was covered by C-SPAN, suggesting it included formal proceedings or congressional-adjacent participation.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Reporting links Dustin Moskovitz, Facebook co-founder and major funder of effective altruism causes, to efforts aimed at shaping AI regulation. The story suggests his philanthropic network is playing an active role in policy debates around artificial intelligence.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Congress is showing increased openness to regulating artificial intelligence, including the possibility of mechanisms to shut down AI systems. The shift suggests lawmakers are moving closer to formal legislative action on AI oversight.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A senior Senate Democrat has entered the debate over how to regulate artificial intelligence, calling for human oversight to remain central to any framework. The comment signals that federal AI legislation is still actively contested, with key figures staking out positions on how much autonomy AI systems should be allowed.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
OpenAI has publicly endorsed the FRONTIER Act, a proposed federal bill aimed at regulating artificial intelligence. The company's support signals a major AI developer actively backing legislation that would govern its own industry.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Lawmakers are scheduled to meet to discuss regulation of artificial intelligence, according to a report from FOX 11 Los Angeles. No details about the scope, participants, or specific proposals have been disclosed.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
U.S. Attorney General Blanche has publicly opposed the use of prosecutorial action as a tool for regulating artificial intelligence, signaling a position against agencies or officials using enforcement cases to effectively set AI policy.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Some lawmakers are pushing for stricter regulation of artificial intelligence, while the White House and Republican lawmakers are resisting those efforts. The split reflects an ongoing political divide over how much federal oversight AI development should face.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A University of West Florida expert is available to comment on the policy debate around balancing artificial intelligence innovation with regulatory oversight.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Senator Alex Padilla spoke publicly about a range of policy issues including mail-in voting, AI regulation, and immigration. The interview covered several areas where federal policy decisions are actively being debated.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Legislators are pushing to regulate artificial intelligence even as they face resistance from those opposing new rules. The headline signals an active policy debate, though the specific proposals and sources of pushback are not detailed.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
President Trump has pushed back against calls for increased federal regulation of artificial intelligence, signaling resistance to stricter government oversight of the technology.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
President Trump has warned that regulating artificial intelligence in the United States could disadvantage the country competitively against China. The comment frames domestic AI oversight as a national security and economic risk rather than a consumer or rights protection.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Congress has not advanced meaningful AI regulation, while the House has turned its attention to legislation focused on the costs associated with data centers. The two tracks reflect a legislature more focused on AI infrastructure economics than on rules governing how AI systems are built or used.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Former President Barack Obama has publicly called for federal regulation of artificial intelligence. No further details on the venue, scope, or specific proposals were provided in available reporting.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The Unlikely Political Bedfellows on A.I. Regulation The New York Times
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance
White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett stated that President Trump firmly opposes federal government control over AI regulation, signaling the administration's preference for a lighter-touch or industry-led approach to governing artificial intelligence.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The Trump administration's AI adviser has pushed back against warnings from technology industry leaders who have called for AI regulation, signaling a policy tension between the White House and some prominent voices in the tech sector.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy