The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
80 results · page 2 of 4
Nvidia's AI chip sales to China are drawing scrutiny from experts concerned about both national security implications and the company's potential sway over U.S. policy. Reports indicate China may allow companies like ByteDance and Alibaba to acquire Nvidia chips that are currently subject to export restrictions.
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
A breach at the Pentagon's Defense Manpower Data Center exposed Social Security numbers and personal information belonging to current and former military personnel. Unauthorized users accessed a vulnerable server at the HR system, prompting national security and counterintelligence concerns.
Who should care: Cybersecurity · Privacy officers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
A divided federal appeals court ruled that the Pentagon can designate Anthropic a supply chain risk, rejecting the AI company's claims that the designation violated its rights. The decision backed the Trump administration's position in a case that pits national security authority against a major AI lab.
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
The United States and China are working toward establishing a communication channel focused on AI-related national security concerns, but the effort is not yet operational. Both countries are simultaneously competing for global leadership in artificial intelligence.
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
As resistance mounts, Trump reaches for a familiar shield: national security Reuters
DeepSeek, the Chinese AI company, is set to brief the UN Security Council on artificial intelligence this week, according to sources. The appearance would mark a notable moment of direct engagement between a major AI developer and the world's primary international security body.
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
US and Chinese officials held talks about creating a mutual notification system for AI incidents that could pose national security risks. The discussions represent an early-stage diplomatic effort to manage AI-related threats between the two countries.
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
President Trump has warned that regulating artificial intelligence in the United States could disadvantage the country competitively against China. The comment frames domestic AI oversight as a national security and economic risk rather than a consumer or rights protection.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
An essay co-authored by Cindy Cohn, published in Lawfare, argues that the mass surveillance architecture built after the September 11 attacks has expanded well beyond its original national security justification and that 25 years is long enough to sustain it.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
China's new tech, national security exit rules take effect Reuters
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance
A breach involving American driver's license data has been characterized as a national security crisis, suggesting the scope and sensitivity of the exposed information goes well beyond a typical consumer data incident.
Who should care: Cybersecurity · Privacy officers · Administrators
Reuters: National security advisers from Britain, Germany, and France have arrived in Kyiv for talks LIGA.net
Costa Rica president says US ground forces would help national security Reuters
The UK government has rejected a Green Party proposal to halt construction of large AI data centres, with Labour calling the moratorium a threat to jobs and national security. Green leader Zack Polanski argued the projects consume too much energy and water to justify their rapid expansion.
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
A federal judge in Northern California ruled that the Pentagon's designation of Anthropic as a supply chain security risk was unlawful, finding no credible national security basis for it. The court characterized the designation as retaliatory and without legal foundation.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
A woman who identifies as a mother, florist, and journalist attended the 2026 Intelligence and National Security Summit and tested facial recognition technology firsthand. The account appears to offer a civilian perspective on surveillance tools typically discussed in professional or government contexts.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration's February decision to designate Anthropic as a supply chain risk to the Pentagon was unlawful, finding that the government had retaliated against the company for publicly criticizing the Defense Department. Judge Rita Lin rejected the national security justification, calling it an empty invocation used to punish a critic.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A federal judge has called the Department of Defense’s designation of Anthropic as a national security supply-chain risk “illegal and baseless.”
The National Security Agency (NSA), FBI and other federal agencies said the campaign is targeting Siemens S7 Series PLCs and was being fueled by “AI-assisted development” alongside exploitation of known vulnerabilities.
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
Sen. Darline Graham avoids giving direct answer to national security question in S.C. debate: 'Not my thing' pbs.org
National security question trips up Sen. Darline Graham in South Carolina debate AP News
On August 12, 2026, the Administration published a National Security Presidential Memorandum (“NSPM”) (“Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cyber-Enabled Crime”) that signals the Administration’s focus on private-sector participation in offensive cyber operations by establishing a federally supervised program to enable private sector participants to conduct offensive cyber operations against “Cyber-Enabled Transnational Criminal Organizations” (“CE-TCOs”). ... Continue Reading…
A policy analysis published by Just Security argues that the United States needs a structured approach to Chinese AI models — one that goes beyond a simple ban but does not dismiss the security concerns those models carry.
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
A set of newly proposed technology bills includes measures to deploy AI for environmental risk assessments related to military operations and to produce a government report on China's AI chip manufacturing capabilities. The proposals reflect growing legislative interest in applying AI to both national security and geopolitical competition.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy