The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
516 results · page 2 of 22
A report from the Center for American Progress argues that the SANDBOX Act, framed as AI policy, would function primarily as a vehicle for broad deregulation rather than a measured approach to governing artificial intelligence.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
While federal AI legislation has made little measurable progress, U.S. states are moving ahead with their own regulatory frameworks, creating a fragmented patchwork of rules across the country.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Massachusetts Representative Lori Trahan spoke publicly about AI regulation and the costs associated with data center infrastructure. The discussion touches on two of the central policy tensions in the current AI debate: how to govern the technology and who bears the economic burden of building it.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Debate over how to regulate artificial intelligence is intensifying, with competing perspectives drawing increased public and political attention.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
New York has begun implementing the RAISE Act, a state-level AI regulation, as Governor Hochul signals that additional AI rules are on the way. The move positions New York as an active player in the growing push by states to govern artificial intelligence.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
On September 17, 2026, the European Commission (the “Commission”) published its proposal for a new EU framework on child safety online (the “KIDS Act”). The proposed Regulation aims to introduce EU-harmonized age-based account restrictions, safety-by-design rules, and age-assurance obligations across a broad range of digital services and systems. The proposal is the latest of a... Continue Reading…
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance
An opinion piece in the University Daily Kansan argues that AI regulation poses a threat to individual freedoms and urges readers to stop supporting it.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A public debate over how to regulate artificial intelligence is drawing consumer-focused attention, with news coverage reflecting growing disagreement about what rules should exist and who should set them.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Sen. Pete Ricketts on Congress' roll in A.I. regulation C-SPAN
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance
A report from Punchbowl News examines potential frameworks for regulating artificial intelligence, outlining how oversight of the technology might be structured in practice.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Australia is seeking cooperation from major technology companies on issues of internet safety and artificial intelligence regulation. The government appears to be pursuing an industry partnership approach rather than relying solely on legislation.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A professor is publicly calling for greater diversity in how AI is regulated, according to a report from NBC News. The specific arguments and context were not detailed in available information.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Democrats are grappling with whether they can form a unified position on regulating artificial intelligence, according to reporting from The Lever. The party has not coalesced around a shared framework, leaving the question of federal AI oversight unsettled.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Candidates running for governor are making AI regulation a campaign issue, arguing that states should have the authority to set their own rules for artificial intelligence rather than leaving it entirely to federal action.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The fight over how to regulate artificial intelligence remains unresolved, with competing interests and authorities still in contest. No clear regulatory framework has emerged, and the dispute over who sets the rules continues.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A Wall Street Journal opinion piece argues that AI regulation in the United States would benefit China, framing domestic oversight efforts as strategically harmful to American competitiveness in the global AI race.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A debate is underway over how strictly the U.S. should regulate AI, with competition from China framing the argument against tighter rules.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed an executive order directing the state to study AI regulation options, including the possibility of a mechanism to shut down AI systems in emergencies. The order signals movement toward formal AI oversight at the state level, though it stops short of enacting binding rules.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Indiana has largely stayed silent on regulating artificial intelligence, taking no significant legislative action on the issue.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Western Washington University has announced a set of institutional changes, including plans for a new college, a possible academic calendar revision, and measures related to AI regulation.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Congressional Black Caucus leadership has weighed in on ongoing debates around AI regulation and data center development, signaling that the caucus is taking an active position on how federal AI policy takes shape.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Despite public calls from technology industry leaders for AI regulation, meaningful policy progress has largely stalled. The gap between stated urgency and actual legislative action remains wide.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Progressive and left-leaning voices broadly support regulating AI but are divided on the urgency of risks and what regulation should actually do. The disagreement reflects deeper tensions about how to weigh near-term harms against longer-term or speculative dangers.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
States across party lines are pushing ahead with their own AI regulations, defying the Trump administration's approach to federal AI policy. Both Republican and Democratic-led states appear to be moving independently rather than deferring to Washington.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy