The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
788 results · page 20 of 33
President Trump has rejected the idea of imposing AI regulations, arguing that safety guardrails would undermine the United States' competitive position against China in the development of artificial intelligence.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
President Trump has framed competition with China as a central factor shaping his administration's approach to AI regulation. The position suggests that keeping the U.S. ahead of China may be used to justify limiting or softening domestic AI oversight.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
House Speaker Mike Johnson has signaled a go-slow stance on AI regulation, publicly urging against alarm over the pace of AI development and suggesting that broad regulatory action is not immediately necessary.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The Trump administration is reportedly considering some form of AI regulation as concerns about the technology continue to grow. No specific proposals or details have been confirmed publicly.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A bipartisan group of governors appeared on Fox News to discuss AI regulation and immigration policy. The conversation reflects growing gubernatorial interest in shaping how AI is governed at the state level.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg publicly criticized Congress for failing to act on AI regulation, calling legislative inaction deeply dangerous. His remarks add to growing public pressure on lawmakers to move faster on rules governing artificial intelligence.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Andrew Yang has argued that authority over AI regulation should rest with Congress rather than other bodies. The statement positions federal legislation as the appropriate mechanism for governing artificial intelligence in the United States.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
President Trump gave a public answer about the future of AI regulation that drew sharp criticism from observers. The specific remarks were widely mocked, though the excerpt does not detail the substance of what he said.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Belarus has scrapped its own artificial intelligence regulatory framework after roughly 18 months and is now deferring to governance models led by Russia and China. The move effectively hands external powers control over how AI is overseen within the country.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The effective altruism movement, closely associated with Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz and other tech billionaires, is facing accusations that it has been working to shape AI regulation to serve its own interests and priorities.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed two AI regulation bills into law. The legislation marks a concrete step by one of the country's most influential states to put legal guardrails around artificial intelligence.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The FDA has published a discussion paper inviting public input on how generative AI tools used in medical devices should be regulated. The agency is in early stages of developing a framework for these technologies.
Who should care: Healthcare professionals · Privacy officers · Compliance · Lawyers · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Legislators are moving to advance AI regulation following a warning from an Anthropic researcher about the potential for AI to pose extinction-level risks to humanity. The warning appears to have given fresh urgency to regulatory efforts that have so far moved slowly.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Calls for AI regulation are intensifying in Washington after a researcher issued a public warning about extinction-level risks from artificial intelligence. The warning appears to have added urgency to ongoing legislative conversations about how to govern the technology.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Representative Lori Trahan is calling on Congress to move past inaction and pass federal legislation governing artificial intelligence. Her remarks reflect growing frustration among some lawmakers that the U.S. has no comprehensive national framework for AI oversight.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The IFPI, which represents the global recorded music industry, is pressing EU member states to fully implement the AI Act's provisions, suggesting the music sector sees the regulation as a tool to protect its interests against AI systems trained on copyrighted content.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The Wall Street Journal is examining the debate over how much regulation AI should face, a question drawing attention from policymakers, industry, and civil society as AI systems become more widely deployed.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Robots staged a protest calling for stronger AI regulation, according to a report from the South China Morning Post. Details about the organizers, location, and specific demands are limited in the available information.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Political strategists are weighing in on growing public and legislative pressure to regulate artificial intelligence. The debate reflects broader uncertainty about how, and how quickly, government should step in to set rules for the technology.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A new Ipsos study finds that when it comes to regulating AI in healthcare, the public's top concerns are whether the technology is accurate and whether humans remain in control of its decisions.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A nonprofit focused on AI regulation is expanding its advocacy efforts at the state level, according to Bloomberg Government. The move signals a push to shape AI policy through state legislatures as federal action remains uncertain.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The UK Green Party has put forward a five-point plan aimed at strengthening regulation of artificial intelligence. No further details about the specific proposals have been disclosed in available reporting.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Wisconsin legislators are considering regulations that would govern how artificial intelligence is used in healthcare settings. The scope and specifics of the proposals have not been detailed, but the effort signals growing state-level attention to AI's role in medical decision-making.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Bradley Tusk of Tusk Ventures has publicly called on government to take a more active role in regulating artificial intelligence, according to a CNBC interview. The venture capitalist's remarks add to a growing chorus of voices pressing lawmakers to move faster on AI oversight.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy