The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
788 results · page 22 of 33
State governments are moving forward with their own AI regulations, pushing back against federal inaction and tech industry lobbying as public pressure builds for accountability over artificial intelligence systems.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Norway is considering regulation or an outright ban on wearable camera headsets, sometimes called 'pervert glasses,' citing the privacy risks posed by devices that can record people without their knowledge in public and private spaces.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · Privacy officers · Policy
At a G20 gathering, the United States advocated for a lighter regulatory touch on artificial intelligence, signaling its preference for minimal government constraints on AI development at the international level.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The United States is pressing G20 nations to adopt minimal AI regulation, framing the push as necessary to stay competitive with China in the global AI race.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Tech industry lobbying efforts to block state-level AI legislation are losing ground, as state lawmakers grow more assertive, federal action remains absent, and funding in favor of regulation increases. The political and financial momentum has shifted enough that some technology advocates are stepping back from the fight.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
The United States is pressing G20 nations to adopt a lighter-touch framework for regulating artificial intelligence, signaling American preference for fewer binding international constraints on the technology.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The United States is moving toward a lighter regulatory touch on artificial intelligence, while the European Union is advancing new binding AI legislation. The two largest economic blocs are heading in opposite directions on how to govern the technology.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Protesters gathered at a G20 event in Chapel Hill to call for regulation of artificial intelligence. The demonstration reflects growing public pressure on governments to set binding rules around AI development and deployment.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A National Law Review piece outlines the shifting legal landscape for workplace AI as new regulations take shape in 2026, offering employers guidance on how to stay compliant as rules around automated hiring, monitoring, and decision-making continue to evolve.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The United States pushed for a light-touch approach to AI regulation during a G20 technology meeting, signaling that Washington favors minimal government intervention over binding international rules for artificial intelligence.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The United States is lobbying G20 nations to adopt a light-touch approach to AI regulation ahead of an upcoming summit in Miami. The push signals Washington's preference for keeping international AI governance frameworks minimal and industry-friendly.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The United States is pressing G-20 nations to adopt a light-touch regulatory stance on artificial intelligence, favoring minimal intervention over stricter oversight frameworks being considered internationally.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
EPIC, in close partnership with youth online safety advocates, worked to encourage lawmakers to amend this bill from its original formulation as a complete ban on youth social media access to instead a regulation that preserves youth access to digital social spaces while ensuring platforms must designed with their safety in mind.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance
The United States plans to push a light-touch approach to AI regulation at an upcoming G20 technology meeting, according to an official familiar with the position. The move signals that Washington intends to use multilateral forums to resist binding international AI oversight frameworks.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The United States is advancing a framework known as the Carolina Principles for AI regulation at the G20 summit, pushing this approach as a model for international governance of artificial intelligence.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The United States plans to push a light-touch approach to AI regulation when the topic comes up at G-20 discussions, according to an official familiar with the position. The move signals that Washington intends to use multilateral forums to resist binding international rules on AI development.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The United States plans to push G20 nations toward a minimal-intervention approach to AI regulation, favoring fewer constraints on AI development at the international level.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Bill Gates has publicly commented on the need for AI ethics and regulation, weighing in on a debate that has drawn increasing attention from technologists, policymakers, and civil society alike.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
The United States plans to push G20 nations toward a minimal-regulation approach to artificial intelligence, according to reporting by Hürriyet Daily News. The move signals Washington's intent to shape international AI governance norms in a direction that limits regulatory burden on the industry.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Nvidia has formed a political action committee to expand its influence over chip and artificial intelligence policy in Washington. The move signals that the company intends to play a more direct role in shaping the federal rules and regulations that govern its industry.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
Raymond James analysts warn that regulatory risk around artificial intelligence is not a short-term political story tied to the midterm elections, but a longer-term concern for the industry.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Greg Jensen of Bridgewater Associates and Nir Bar Dea have spoken out in favor of AI regulation, signaling that prominent figures in institutional finance and investment are lending their voices to the governance debate.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Democratic candidates in competitive House and Senate races have signed a pledge committing to AI regulation, with the move coming alongside increased scrutiny of data center development.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has published a formal policy position calling for the elimination of automated license plate reader mass surveillance, arguing that ALPR systems are structurally harmful and cannot be made acceptable through regulation or technical fixes.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy