The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
116 results · page 3 of 5
A legal battle over the regulatory status of prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket has escalated into a broad political fight, drawing in the Trump administration, a member of the president's family, and attorney generals from nearly every state.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance
German privacy group noyb has sent a cease-and-desist letter to credit agency SCHUFA after investigations revealed it retained millions of records that should have been deleted, and used them for customer testing. Noyb has opened an interest list for a class action, with up to 69 million people potentially affected.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance
The UK's Information Commissioner's Office has called for stronger oversight of how police use facial recognition technology, signaling concern that current controls are insufficient to govern the practice.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
The UK's Information Commissioner's Office conducted audits of police use of facial recognition technology and found inconsistent results across the forces reviewed. The findings suggest compliance and practice vary significantly, with no uniform standard being met.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
The UK's Information Commissioner's Office reviewed police use of facial recognition technology and found it to be largely compliant with data protection law. The assessment stops short of a full endorsement but does not identify systemic violations.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
New research from the UK's Information Commissioner's Office points to a widening disconnect between how safe parents believe their children are online and what children are actually experiencing in digital spaces.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance
The UK's Information Commissioner's Office has called on police forces to strengthen how they manage data as facial recognition technology is deployed more widely. The ICO's intervention signals concerns about compliance and oversight during the rollout.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Xicom, an AI development firm, has announced steps to align its practices with US data privacy rules under CCPA and CPRA. The move positions the company as compliant with California's consumer privacy framework as it applies to AI-built products and services.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
A state privacy regulator has issued its second enforcement decision against an out-of-state data broker, signaling continued regulatory action beyond its own borders. The decision adds to a pattern of state-level agencies asserting jurisdiction over companies that collect and sell resident data regardless of where those companies are based.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · Policy
France's data protection authority, the CNIL, and the French AI and Digital Council released a joint exploratory note examining how existing data protection rules apply to agentic AI systems. The document is framed as an early-stage analysis rather than binding guidance.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance · General readers · Policy
The European Data Protection Supervisor has issued a formal opinion on the European Commission's proposal to update the regulation governing Eurojust, the EU's judicial cooperation agency for serious cross-border crime.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance · Compliance
The European Data Protection Supervisor has issued a formal opinion on the European Commission's proposal to revise and replace the existing regulation governing Europol, the EU's law enforcement agency.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance · Compliance
The European Data Protection Supervisor has issued a formal Opinion on the European Commission's proposed changes to the EU Data Protection Regulation, the law that governs how EU institutions handle personal data internally. The EUDPR applies specifically to the Union's own bodies and agencies, not to member states.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The UK's Information Commissioner's Office has launched free data protection training aimed at small and medium-sized businesses. The new resource is designed to help SMEs understand and meet their legal obligations under data protection law.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance · General readers · Policy
California's privacy regulator has filed its first enforcement action against a data broker under both the California Consumer Privacy Act and the Delete Act, marking a significant step in the state's use of its data broker oversight tools.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The European Data Protection Board has called for a review of the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that affects the independence of the Federal Trade Commission, a key enforcement body underpinning the transatlantic data transfer agreement.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance · General readers · Policy
I need to work carefully here — the excerpt gives almost nothing beyond the headline. I'll write only what the headline and source reasonably imply: the UK's Information Commissioner's Office issued a public statement following a ruling by the Upper Tribunal, which is an appellate body that hears ch
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance
On July 28, 2026, the New York Office of the Attorney General released final rules (the “Rules”) implementing the Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids Act, which goes into effect on January 25, 2027. The SAFE for Kids Act requires online “addictive social media platforms,” which are defined as websites, online services, and applications... Continue Reading…
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance
The European Data Protection Board has released draft guidelines updating its 2014 position on anonymisation, offering a more structured framework for determining when data can be treated as truly anonymous. The guidelines reflect the EDPB's cautious stance while attempting to give organisations clearer criteria for making that assessment.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance · General readers · Policy
The European Data Protection Board has called for a review of the EU-US Data Privacy Framework following the Trump v. Slaughter case, which relates to the dismissal of Federal Trade Commission members and raises concerns about the independence of the US enforcement body underpinning the transatlantic data transfer agreement.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance · General readers · Policy
Liechtenstein's government has confirmed a cyberattack that resulted in the theft of approximately 31,000 personal records. Given the country's population of around 41,000, the breach potentially affects the majority of its residents.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance
Italy's government and its data protection authority are in dispute over a plan to retain facial biometric data, with the two bodies holding conflicting positions on whether the practice is legal.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
The European Data Protection Supervisor has released its latest newsletter, covering topics including cross-regulator information sharing rules, AI use in hiring, mobile driving licences, automated visa checks, and data handling in organ transplantation.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The European Data Protection Board has released draft guidelines on anonymization, offering new technical and legal benchmarks for when data can be considered truly anonymous and therefore outside the scope of GDPR obligations. The guidelines are aimed at clarifying a standard that organizations have long applied inconsistently.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance