The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
361 results · page 4 of 16
British Transport Police has expanded its live facial recognition trial to include London Underground stations, extending a surveillance program that was previously deployed at surface-level transport hubs.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Moscow police beat a 15-year-old boy after an AI-powered facial recognition system incorrectly identified him as a drug suspect. The incident, reported by Meduza, illustrates the real-world consequences of misidentification by automated surveillance tools used by law enforcement.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Australia's Office of the Australian Information Commissioner has released updated guidance on the use of facial recognition technology, signaling closer regulatory attention to how organizations deploy this form of biometric surveillance.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
NIST has published new benchmark results covering advances in tattoo and facial recognition technology, measuring how accurately these biometric systems identify people. The benchmarks are part of NIST's ongoing effort to evaluate the performance of identification tools used by government and industry.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Several San Francisco gay bars have dropped plans to use AI-assisted facial recognition technology following significant backlash from the community over privacy concerns. The reversal came after patrons and advocates pushed back against the prospect of biometric scanning at LGBTQ+ venues.
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy · Privacy officers
London's transport authority is set to trial facial recognition technology at Underground stations, according to reports. The scope, duration, and oversight arrangements for the trial have not been detailed in available information.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
China has deployed a facial recognition system at a hydroelectric station in Tibet that identifies individual fish, according to reporting by Interesting Engineering. The technology applies biometric identification techniques, previously associated with human surveillance, to aquatic wildlife monitoring at the facility.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Several popular gay bars in San Francisco have removed facial recognition technology following a pressure campaign targeting the venues. The decision marks a reversal for establishments that had adopted the surveillance tools, likely for entry screening or security purposes.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Facial recognition technology is being used at public protests, effectively ending the practical anonymity that demonstrators have historically relied on. The piece argues this shift carries direct consequences for democratic participation and civil liberties.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Australia is seeing developments around the regulation or use of facial recognition technology, with privacy implications significant enough to prompt legal analysis from major international law firms.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
CAYIN Technology has announced AI AudienceSense, a product that uses real-time facial recognition, likely aimed at analyzing audiences in digital signage or retail environments.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
The city of Gadsden, Alabama has approved its police department's use of facial recognition technology for in-house investigations. The decision brings the city into a growing number of local law enforcement agencies adopting the biometric tool.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Police have deployed facial recognition technology in the vicinity of the Boardmasters Festival, a large music and surf event in the UK. The use of the surveillance tool near a public gathering is drawing attention from privacy observers.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Facial recognition technology is being used in policing in ways that have led to wrongful arrests, with critics arguing the technology gives law enforcement a convenient cover for investigative failures rather than a reliable identification tool.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A growing number of companies now sell clothing printed with patterns intended to confuse facial recognition algorithms and make wearers harder to identify. Experts note the products are largely untested and that surveillance systems may already be capable of overcoming partial interference.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A demonstration showed that AI-generated code can turn an inexpensive consumer drone into a facial recognition stalking device, with the total hardware cost coming in around $100. The experiment illustrates how accessible tools are lowering the barrier to building autonomous surveillance systems.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Police have defended their use of live facial recognition technology at the Boardmasters Festival in the UK, where the system scanned thousands of attendees without most of them having any prior notice or meaningful choice to opt out.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Hong Kong authorities are considering deploying drones equipped with AI facial recognition technology to enforce a smoking ban at construction sites, having issued 39 fines through existing enforcement so far.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Apple is set to face a lawsuit seeking $32.5 billion over allegations related to facial recognition technology embedded in its Photos app. The case centers on claims that Apple collected or processed users' biometric data without adequate consent.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A lawsuit alleging that Apple's Photos app collected facial recognition data without proper user consent has been cleared to proceed. The ruling allows plaintiffs to pursue claims that Apple processed biometric information in ways users were not adequately informed about.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
SAFR and Anava have partnered to run facial recognition software directly on Axis network cameras, processing biometric data at the device level rather than sending footage to a central server. The integration allows facial recognition to operate with reduced latency and without a cloud dependency.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Apple is facing a lawsuit seeking approximately $32.5 billion over allegations that the facial recognition features built into its iPhone Photos app collected or processed biometric data without adequate user consent. The case targets one of Apple's core organizational tools for personal photo libraries.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
The Center for Democracy and Technology has released an issue brief laying out what it sees as essential restrictions on the use of facial recognition technology. The document outlines specific limits CDT believes should govern how and when facial recognition can be deployed.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Some Grocery Outlet locations have deployed facial recognition technology, prompting consumer awareness reporting about what the practice means for shoppers. The extent of the rollout and how the collected data is handled have not been fully disclosed by the company.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy