The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
401 results · page 5 of 17
The EFF and ACLU of Northern California have sent a formal demand letter to the Marin County Sheriff's Office after the agency allegedly shared automated license plate reader data from its Flock Safety system with out-of-state and federal agencies, in apparent violation of California law.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity
Jacksonville police have been linked to wrongful arrests tied to facial recognition technology, drawing attention to how law enforcement agencies are deploying the tools in ways that lead to misidentification and serious harm to individuals.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
An international law enforcement operation called Operation KillSwitch dismantled the KillSec ransomware group, seizing its data leak site and servers and making three arrests. Investigators identified a 16-year-old as the group's alleged administrator.
Who should care: Cybersecurity · Privacy officers · Administrators · Lawyers · Compliance
The American Psychological Association has published a judicial notebook examining how law enforcement agencies use facial recognition technology. The piece appears aimed at informing judges and legal professionals about the science and implications behind the technology.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A report profiles the early pioneers credited with developing facial recognition technology, framing them as the foundational figures behind a surveillance tool now embedded in law enforcement, commerce, and public life.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Six major AI companies signed a voluntary agreement with the White House committing to implement safety safeguards. The agreement carries no enforcement mechanism, leaving its practical effect uncertain.
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
The Trump administration has secured voluntary commitments from dozens of AI companies to conduct safety testing on their systems. No binding rules or enforcement mechanisms are attached to the agreements.
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
The Federal Trade Commission has opened an industry-wide investigation into AI companies including Anthropic and OpenAI, examining potential consumer harms from their technology. The action is the first formal U.S. enforcement move specifically focused on rogue AI agents, prompted by a reported surge in related incidents.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
The City of Radford, Virginia announced a potential data breach that has taken its internet systems offline. City officials have engaged cybersecurity experts and legal counsel, and have notified both state and federal law enforcement.
Who should care: Cybersecurity · Privacy officers · Administrators · Lawyers · Compliance
The EFF's latest EFFector newsletter addresses privacy concerns around Apple's AI-expanded Siri features in iOS 27, alongside coverage of drone recording rights, video doorbell privacy, and practical guidance on limiting what data the updated assistant can access.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
A vendor is proposing to add a facial recognition capability on top of data already collected by Flock Safety cameras, which are widely used by law enforcement agencies across the United States for license plate reading and vehicle tracking.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
An AI surveillance company is pushing to integrate facial recognition technology into Flock, a license plate reader network already widely used by law enforcement agencies across the United States. The move would combine two powerful identification tools into a single searchable platform.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
The Federal Trade Commission has opened an investigation into OpenAI and Anthropic, signaling a more active regulatory posture toward leading AI companies. The move suggests federal scrutiny of the AI industry is entering a more formal, enforcement-oriented stage.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · AI governance · Administrators · General readers · Policy
San Francisco has decided to keep its automated license plate reader surveillance program in place, announcing new policies that critics say fall well short of meaningful protection. Civil liberties advocates argue the safeguards leave residents exposed to wrongful stops, officer misuse, and data sharing with federal immigration authorities.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A lawmaker has pushed back on Apple's stated justification for removing apps that track U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity from its App Store, calling the explanation inadequate and demanding answers about any role the Trump administration may have played in the decision.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity
A live facial recognition trial in London concluded with one false positive identification, zero arrests, and a cost of £320,000 to the public. The results raise serious questions about whether the deployment delivered any meaningful law enforcement value.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Flock Safety, a company that sells license plate reader cameras widely used by law enforcement, has communicated to police that it intends to add facial recognition capability to its camera network.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Dutch authorities arrested a 24-year-old Amsterdam man alleged to be a leader of the ShinyHunters hacking group. The arrest came roughly one week before the group carried out a separate hack against the FBI.
Who should care: Cybersecurity · Privacy officers · Administrators · Lawyers · Compliance
A grandmother has filed a lawsuit alleging that a facial recognition error by law enforcement led to her being wrongfully jailed for months. Experts in the field are raising concerns about the reliability and consequences of using AI-based identification in criminal cases.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
A former attorney is warning that AI-powered facial recognition technology is contributing to wrongful arrests, raising concerns about the reliability of automated identification tools used in law enforcement.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
EPIC and several consumer advocacy organizations filed a comment with the FTC arguing that personalized pricing based on surveillance data should be treated as an unfair trade practice, not merely addressed through disclosure requirements. The groups are pushing the agency to take stronger enforcement action than its current proposed policy statement.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A wave of nearly 100 new laws is taking effect this week, covering a wide range of issues including artificial intelligence regulation, facial recognition, immigration enforcement, and firearms.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Bill Gates told NBC's Meet the Press that AI development without oversight could cause catastrophic harm on a massive scale. He called on lawmakers and law enforcement to get involved in setting safeguards, saying self-regulation by the industry is not sufficient.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · AI governance · Administrators · General readers · Policy
A Florida father was wrongfully arrested after facial recognition AI misidentified him as a suspect in a crime that occurred roughly 300 miles from where he lives. The case is one of a growing number of documented false matches tied to automated identification tools used in law enforcement.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy