The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
786 results · page 5 of 33
A rise in cyberattacks in Japan is driving policy debate over stricter rules on AI and data security. Lawmakers and regulators appear to be reconsidering the adequacy of existing frameworks in light of the increased threat.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
New York has enacted legislation prohibiting what it deems unsafe AI chatbots from being used with or by children, joining a growing number of states moving to regulate artificial intelligence through their own laws.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The National Law Review published Issue 35 of its Data Privacy and AI Regulatory Quick Clicks series, a recurring roundup covering developments in data privacy and AI regulation.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy · Privacy officers
Switzerland is moving forward with AI regulation built around specific industries rather than a single overarching law, pairing that approach with voluntary codes of conduct. The strategy reflects a preference for flexible, targeted rules over the sweeping framework model the EU has adopted.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Ben Goertzel, a prominent figure in artificial general intelligence research, spoke with The Washington Post about AI regulation. The specific positions or proposals discussed were not detailed in the available excerpt.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
New York has passed legislation prohibiting chatbots from engaging in behavior deemed unsafe when interacting with minors, making it one of the more direct state-level moves to regulate AI systems that children encounter.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
California has enacted four new laws expanding regulation of artificial intelligence in the workplace. The laws place new obligations on employers operating in the state, though the specific requirements vary across the legislation.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Australian experts are calling for a careful, sector-specific approach to AI policy as it applies to early childhood settings, rather than broad one-size-fits-all regulation.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
A Lawfare piece argues that AI model weights — the core numerical parameters that define how a trained model behaves — may warrant First Amendment protection, framing regulation of those weights as a potential speech issue.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
The Trump administration has moved to roll back regulatory requirements governing the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare, reducing federal oversight in a sector where AI tools are increasingly used in clinical and administrative decisions.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A commentary piece outlines five key considerations around the regulation of platform plugins and AI tools, touching on how these integrations intersect with emerging governance frameworks.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Bloomberg Government has identified nine electoral races in the 2026 cycle that it considers most consequential for AI policy and data center development. The outcome of these contests is expected to shape the direction of legislation and regulation in both areas.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
Business and financial groups are pushing back against proposed AI regulations, warning that certain provisions could create unintended burdens. A key sticking point is a requirement for human review of AI decisions that applies only when 'commercially reasonable,' a standard that critics on both sides say is too vague to be enforceable.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy · Privacy officers
A piece published in The Hill argues that AI regulation carries a significant risk: giving governments broad, unchecked authority over how AI systems are built and used.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Momentum for AI regulation is building in the United States as midterm elections approach, with the political landscape appearing to shift toward legislative action on artificial intelligence.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A poll conducted by NetChoice and Echelon Insights finds that voters place AI regulation low on their list of priorities compared to economic concerns like the cost of living. Respondents also expressed a preference for a single national AI standard rather than a patchwork of state-level rules.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Italy has enacted Legislative Decree No. 179/2026, establishing the national framework for implementing the EU AI Act. The decree sets out the domestic rules organizations operating in Italy must follow to comply with the broader European regulation.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
Major Indian media organizations have taken the Modi government's new data privacy rules to the country's highest court, challenging the regulations through formal legal proceedings.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · Privacy officers · Policy
Indian media organizations have brought a legal challenge before the country's Supreme Court against new data privacy regulations. The case puts press freedom and data protection law on a direct collision course at the highest judicial level.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · Privacy officers · Policy
The EU AI Act includes provisions that apply to agentic AI systems — software that can act autonomously, make decisions, and take actions with limited human oversight. The piece examines how the regulation's existing framework maps onto these systems.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Anthropic has publicly identified the prospect of tighter AI regulation as a material risk to its business, disclosing this concern in what appears to be a formal filing or investor-facing document.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Anthropic has flagged political exposure as a formal risk factor ahead of a potential public offering, warning investors that its public stances on AI safety and regulation could attract backlash or government restrictions.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
China is moving into a more active phase of AI regulation in 2026, with a focus on enforcement, clearer guidance, and compliance expectations for companies operating in or connected to the Chinese market.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · AI governance · Administrators · General readers · Policy
New Jersey Democrats are positioning to advance state-level regulation of data centers and artificial intelligence if control of Congress shifts. The push reflects growing interest among state lawmakers in filling federal gaps on tech oversight.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy