The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
516 results · page 6 of 22
President Trump has rejected calls for AI regulation and dismissed safety warnings about the technology as a hoax. The position signals a federal posture that favors open AI development with little government oversight.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Alex Bores, who lost a congressional primary contest that revolved around A.I. regulation, is trying to position himself at the center of the conversation for the next presidential election.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
California's privacy regulator has issued fines against data brokers, while Colorado is moving forward with proposed rules to govern artificial intelligence. Both actions reflect continued momentum at the state level on consumer data and automated decision-making.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Senator Jon Ossoff has accused the Trump administration of being compromised on AI safety regulation, while former President Barack Obama has added his voice to calls for slowing down AI development. The remarks reflect growing bipartisan concern about the pace and oversight of AI deployment.
Who should care: Cybersecurity · Privacy officers · Administrators · Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Australia is actively debating how to regulate artificial intelligence, with discussions underway about the appropriate framework for oversight.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Technology executives are publicly calling for federal AI regulation, but the Trump administration and Congress have shown little urgency to move forward with legislation. The gap between industry appetite for rules and political action leaves the AI sector largely self-governed for now.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Major tech executives are publicly calling for government regulation of artificial intelligence, but the Trump administration and Congress have shown little urgency to move forward with legislation.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Representative Lori Trahan spoke on the topic of AI regulation, as covered by C-SPAN. No further details about her specific positions or the context of her remarks are available from this report.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Representative Bill Foster (D-IL) made public remarks on the topic of AI regulation, as covered by C-SPAN. The specific content of his statements is not detailed in available information.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut addressed the topic of AI regulation, according to C-SPAN coverage. No further details about the substance of his remarks are available from the provided information.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Calls for federal AI legislation are growing, but political gridlock in Congress is blocking progress on a national regulatory framework. The debate reflects deep disagreement over how, and whether, the federal government should govern artificial intelligence.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
CNN commentator Van Jones addressed the topic of potential AI regulation in a segment for the network. The specific policy proposals or regulatory frameworks discussed were not detailed in available reporting.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Vice President JD Vance has characterized AI regulation as a 'Trojan horse,' suggesting that proposed oversight measures conceal motives beyond their stated purpose of governing artificial intelligence.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
UCLA faculty or researchers appear to be contributing commentary to public discussions about whether efforts to tighten AI regulation are gaining traction. The headline suggests a roundup of media appearances rather than a single news event.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
NBC News is asking whether Congress can pass AI regulation legislation before the midterm elections, reflecting ongoing uncertainty about the federal government's timeline for establishing rules around artificial intelligence.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Australia is engaged in an active public debate over how to regulate artificial intelligence, with policymakers and stakeholders weighing competing approaches to oversight.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Tech leaders are publicly calling for a slowdown in AI development, intensifying an ongoing debate over how and when governments should regulate the technology. The push reflects growing disagreement within the industry about the pace of AI deployment and the role of regulatory oversight.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Michigan lawmakers are pushing to establish new rules governing artificial intelligence, adding the state to a growing list of legislatures taking up AI regulation. The effort reflects broader momentum at the state level to fill gaps left by the absence of comprehensive federal AI law.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A newly formed bipartisan Senate science caucus will take on AI among other scientific policy areas, with a stated focus on strengthening U.S. innovation and shaping AI regulation.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Growing pressure to regulate AI is drawing attention to a potential side effect: slower development of the data centers that power AI systems. Regulatory uncertainty may give developers and investors reason to pause before committing to large infrastructure projects.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Massachusetts Governor Healey is calling for federal AI regulation, positioning herself alongside voices urging more oversight at the same time some industry leaders are asking for a slower regulatory pace.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The debate over how to regulate artificial intelligence has extended to Memphis, coinciding with calls from some technology leaders to slow the pace of AI development or deployment. The local discussion reflects a broader national conversation about who should set the rules for AI and when.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Shapiro calls for regulation of AI development after top tech leaders speak out WGAL
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Senate Majority Leader John Thune has signaled he favors minimal federal AI regulation and expects bipartisan legislation to emerge soon. No details about the bill's scope or sponsors have been disclosed.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy