The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
670 results · page 9 of 28
After the Mythos ban, acceleration AI ethics proposes a third way: Safety through innovation EurekAlert!
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
As Calls for AI Regulation Grow, Media Faces a Defining Moment NAB Show
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Federal social media bill threatens to undermine privacy rights, alienate youth: critics [audio] NB Media Co-op
Who should care: General readers · Privacy officers · Policy
Facial recognition boom tests governance and public trust Biometric Update
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Does a thought-experiment about US ascendancy in the technology say as much about AI jitters as it does about the reality? It’s 2031 and the US and China are about to tear Europe into pieces. The US ploughed vast sums into datacentres and the EU did not. China built robots and Europe did not. American companies “restructured” their workflows around AI and fired people, while EU workers went on long lunch breaks and handed over administrative tasks to the AI model Claude. Continue reading...
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
Vermont Strengthens Its Data Broker Law (via Passle) Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Who should care: General readers · Privacy officers · Policy
Western Australia police launch trial of NEC’s live facial recognition Biometric Update
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A new federal lawsuit references investigative reporting by WESH 2 in connection with a wrongful arrest allegedly caused by facial recognition technology, suggesting the incident has escalated from a news story into formal legal action.
Why this matters: Wrongful arrests driven by facial recognition errors illustrate the concrete civil-liberties stakes of biometric surveillance — particularly for misidentified individuals who face detention without reliable evidence, raising urgent due-process concerns.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Facial recognition tech is coming to a queer bar near you — if it’s not already there LGBTQ Nation
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Facewatch, a UK-based retail facial recognition surveillance company, has received a responsible AI certification for its platform, which identifies individuals flagged as potential shoplifting or crime risks in participating stores.
Why this matters: Certification signals institutional legitimacy, but mass biometric surveillance of shoppers — many never accused of wrongdoing — raises persistent concerns about consent, error rates, and whether a compliance label meaningfully constrains how this data is collected, retained, or shared.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Civil society: Police facial recognition must be strictly limited Computer Weekly
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Nassau Financial Group invests in AI governance startup Trussed AI Hartford Business Journal
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
Why the future of AI governance depends on human judgment The World Economic Forum
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
Governments Must Lead on AI Governance Instead of Ceding Responsibilities to AI Labs, Says Sam Altman MIT Sloan Management Review Middle East
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
US-Iran talks in Switzerland canceled. And, DHS to give police facial recognition app NPR
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
US-Iran talks in Switzerland canceled. And, DHS to give police facial recognition app NPR
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
On June 9th, Anthropic released its Fable generative AI model. Three days later, the US government classified it as a dangerous munition, and used its export-control authority to prohibit any foreign nationals from accessing it. Unable to differentiate between Americans and foreigners, the company shut off access for everyone. The government’s actions won’t help. The problem isn’t any one particular model; it’s the general trend of increasing AI capabilities. And any real solution requires the sort of collective action that just isn’t possible right now...
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
The Miami-based AI startup Subquadratic came out of stealth mode last month with a huge claim. It announced that it had solved a mathematical bottleneck that had been holding back large language models for almost a decade. The details were thin, and many people were unconvinced. But Subquadratic has started to bring the receipts, sharing…
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
Some local police have access to an ICE facial recognition app New England News Collaborative
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Some local police have access to an ICE facial recognition app KMXT
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Some local police have access to an ICE facial recognition app NPR
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Some local police have access to an ICE facial recognition app South Carolina Public Radio
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Facial recognition AI misidentifies Utah man in felony vandalism case KUTV
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is moving to equip local law enforcement agencies with a facial recognition application to support immigration enforcement operations, according to Biometric Update. The initiative would extend biometric identification capabilities beyond federal agencies to local police departments.
Why this matters: Distributing facial recognition tools to local police for immigration purposes expands surveillance infrastructure into communities, raising Fourth Amendment concerns and increasing the risk of misidentification affecting citizens and non-citizens alike — with limited transparency about use, oversight, or error-rate accountability.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy