Carmelo Fontana (AIRIA): “In AI governance, legal and technical must speak the same language
Carmelo Fontana of AIRIA argues that effective AI governance depends on legal and technical professionals developing a shared vocabulary and working framework. The claim is that siloed expertise — lawyers who do not understand the systems and engineers who do not understand the rules — produces governance that looks good on paper but fails in practice.
Why this matters: Most AI governance problems are not purely legal or purely technical. They are both, and the gap between the two teams is where accountability goes to die. Lawyers write policies around systems they have never seen. Engineers ship systems without reading the policies. The result is documentation that satisfies auditors and protects almost no one. If the people setting the rules cannot talk to the people building the product, the rules do not really apply. Closing that gap is less glamorous than new regulation, but it matters more.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
This summary is AI-assisted and may contain errors. It is an original briefing to help you gauge significance quickly — not a reproduction of the source. Always read the linked original before relying on it. See our methodology.