PrivacySignal
AI Governance

EFF Joins Call for FTC to Drop Its Disastrous AI Policy Proposal

Electronic Frontier Foundation · · International · AI Governance

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has joined a coalition calling on the Federal Trade Commission to withdraw an AI policy proposal the groups consider harmful. The specific proposal and its provisions are disputed, with critics arguing it would damage consumer protections or civil liberties rather than strengthen them.

Why this matters: The FTC is one of the few agencies with real teeth when it comes to holding tech companies accountable for how they build and deploy AI. If a proposal meant to govern that space is flawed enough that privacy advocates like EFF are asking for it to be scrapped entirely, that is worth paying attention to. Bad AI policy does not just fail to protect people. It can actively make things worse by locking in weak rules or giving companies cover they do not deserve. Getting this right matters more than getting it done fast.

Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy

This summary is AI-assisted and may contain errors. It is an original briefing to help you gauge significance quickly — not a reproduction of the source. Always read the linked original before relying on it. See our methodology.

Related stories

News
The Guardian — Tech · · International

Beast of Reincarnation review – a taxing reflection of human-made damage

PC, Xbox, PlayStation 5; Game Freak/FictionsGame Freak channels a post-apocalyptic reality that reflects our own repetitive erosion cycles, with a fair bit of hand-holding Most of your time in Beast of Reincarnation is spent collecting last words. You cross paths with robots lying on the ground, who muster whatever energy they have left to provide guidance. These interactions are fleeting. Attempt to talk to them a second time, and protagonist Emma makes their fates painfully clear: “They’ve already passed on.” The latest detour by Game Freak, the studio best known as the primary developer of…

Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy

#regulation#ai Read original →
News
EFF — Deeplinks · · International

The Senate Should Reject KOSA's Privacy Risks

The Senate Commerce Committee is once again considering legislation that would dramatically expand age verification, and undermine privacy for everyone. Alongside the SCREEN Act, the CHATBOT Act, and the Youth AI Privacy Act, the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) would push companies to collect more information about their users while creating new incentives to restrict lawful speech. Take action Tell Congress: KOSA endangers the privacy of all KOSA Pushes Platforms Toward Age Verification The Senate version of KOSA imposes a “duty of care” on online services, including social media, to avoid exp…

Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy · Privacy officers

#ai#privacy Read original →
AI Governance
F Flatwater Free Press · · International

July 27: Ralston School Board reviews summer programs, communication efforts and AI policy

The Ralston School Board met to review summer programming, district communications, and an emerging policy on artificial intelligence. The session signals that the district is actively shaping rules around AI use, though specific policy details were not disclosed in available reporting.

Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy

#ai-governance#ai Read original →
AI Governance
M Malwarebytes · · International

The AI Act kicks into action, forces companies to be clear about AI chatbots

The EU's AI Act has begun enforcement, requiring companies to disclose when users are interacting with AI chatbots rather than humans. The rules mark a concrete shift from policy to compliance obligation for businesses operating in the European market.

Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy

#ai-governance#ai Read original →