PrivacySignal
News

EPIC and CDT Urge FCC to Reconsider Invasive Know Your Customer Rulemaking Proposal

EPIC · · US Federal · Privacy Law

EPIC and the Center for Democracy & Technology filed comments urging the FCC to reconsider a proposed rule that would expand Know Your Customer requirements for voice service providers, requiring more personal data collection from individual customers. The groups support the goal of reducing illegal robocalls and scam calls but take issue with the FCC's approach.

Why this matters: Fighting robocalls is a popular goal. Almost nobody is against it. But 'collect more data on everyone' is a pattern worth watching, because it tends to outlast the problem it was built to solve. If the FCC mandates broader identity collection from phone customers, that data exists somewhere, can be breached, and can be repurposed. EPIC and CDT are not saying ignore the scam call problem. They are saying the cure should not create a permanent surveillance infrastructure around ordinary phone use.

Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · Privacy officers · Policy

This summary is AI-assisted and may contain errors. It is an original briefing to help you gauge significance quickly — not a reproduction of the source. Always read the linked original before relying on it. See our methodology.

Analysis

All analysis →

Weekly Editorial Analysis from Experts and Editors

Related stories

News
Data Protection Commission · · EU / Ireland

Guidance on the use of CCTV in Residential Care Settings

Ireland's Data Protection Commission has issued guidance addressing how closed-circuit television should be used in residential care settings. The guidance is aimed at helping care facilities handle surveillance in a way that complies with data protection rules.

Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · General readers · Privacy officers · Policy

#regulation#privacy Read original →
News
IAPP · · International

Notes from the IAPP Canada: The tongue-tied truth about privacy

A report from the IAPP Canada event reflects on candor and clarity in how privacy professionals talk about privacy — suggesting there may be a gap between what practitioners know and what they say publicly.

Who should care: General readers · Privacy officers · Policy