PrivacySignal
News

Facial Recognition at Madison Square Garden

Schneier on Security · · International · Surveillance & Civil Liberties

Madison Square Garden operates a facial recognition system that scans all visitors and flags certain activists, including those who oppose facial recognition technology. The system was reportedly disabled during a Taylor Swift event, even as Swift herself has used similar technology at her own concerts to identify stalkers.

Why this matters: MSG is scanning every person who walks through the door — not just people they have reason to watch. That is a lot of faces, and some of those people are being flagged specifically because they object to being scanned. The deactivation for one celebrity's event makes the real logic plain: this system runs when it benefits the venue, and gets switched off when the wrong people might notice. The activists being flagged are not a threat. They are critics. There is a real difference, and a private entertainment company probably should not be the one deciding who gets watched.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

This summary is AI-assisted and may contain errors. It is an original briefing to help you gauge significance quickly — not a reproduction of the source. Always read the linked original before relying on it. See our methodology.

Related stories

News
T The Conversation · · International

Sports venues are offering facial recognition to let people in. What are the risks?

Sports venues are increasingly using facial recognition technology as an entry system, allowing attendees to pass through gates by scanning their faces instead of presenting tickets or IDs. The shift raises concerns about how biometric data is collected, stored, and used beyond its stated purpose.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#surveillance#privacy Read original →
News
S SC Media · · International

Australian privacy watchdog clarifies rules on facial recognition in retail

Australia's privacy regulator has issued clarifying guidance on how retailers may lawfully use facial recognition technology, setting out expectations for compliance with existing privacy rules. The move responds to growing retail adoption of the technology for loss prevention and security purposes.

Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#regulation#surveillance#privacy Read original →
News
B Biometric Update · · International

Australia clarifies when retailers can legally use facial recognition

Australian authorities have issued clarification on the legal conditions under which retailers are permitted to deploy facial recognition technology, setting out when such use complies with existing privacy rules. The guidance addresses a gap that had left both businesses and consumers uncertain about the boundaries of biometric surveillance in commercial spaces.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#surveillance#privacy Read original →
News
The Guardian — Tech · · International

Flock surveillance cameras can pose a crash risk for drivers, US experts say

U.S. road safety advocates are raising concerns that Flock Safety's automated license plate reader cameras may be placed in locations that create physical hazards for drivers, adding a new dimension to existing criticism of the company's surveillance practices. The issue centers on whether the cameras' roadside positioning meets highway safety standards.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy

#surveillance#ai#privacy Read original →
News
A Animation Xpress · · International

Japan's Pokémon Card Stores to require facial recognition for entry and TCG purchases -

Pokémon Card Stores in Japan are set to require facial recognition scanning for customers to enter the stores and purchase trading cards. The move appears aimed at controlling resellers or managing high-demand inventory, though specific operational details remain limited.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#surveillance#privacy Read original →
News
The Guardian — Tech · · International

Atlassian tightens tracking of staff AI use as other technology firms encourage ‘tokenmaxxing’

Atlassian has introduced monthly spending caps of up to $2,000 per employee on AI tools, framing the move as cost control at a time when some tech firms are doing the opposite — pushing staff to maximize AI use and even ranking them on leaderboards for it.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy

#surveillance#ai Read original →