PrivacySignal
News

‘I’m not spying’: how Meta’s smartglasses have divided opinion

The Guardian — Tech · · International · Privacy Law

Meta's Ray-Ban smartglasses have sold over 7 million pairs in 2025, making them one of the most widely adopted wearable devices globally. Their popularity has split opinion between users who value the photography and accessibility features and critics concerned about covert recording and data collection.

Why this matters: The problem with a popular camera you wear on your face is that everyone around you gets recorded too, and they never agreed to it. Unlike a phone, smartglasses give no obvious signal that filming is happening. Bystanders cannot see a lens being raised or a screen being pointed at them. That asymmetry is the issue. Seven million pairs means this is no longer a niche gadget story. It is a question about whose comfort gets prioritized in public space, and right now the answer is clearly the person wearing the glasses.

Who should care: General readers · Privacy officers · Policy

This summary is AI-assisted and may contain errors. It is an original briefing to help you gauge significance quickly — not a reproduction of the source. Always read the linked original before relying on it. See our methodology.

Related stories

News
The Guardian — Tech · · International

Restaurants, pubs and theatres ban Meta’s ‘spy glasses’ over privacy fears

A number of UK restaurants, pubs, and theatres have moved to ban Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses on their premises, citing privacy concerns for customers and staff. Meta says the glasses have safeguards against covert recording, but venues are not waiting to find out.

Who should care: General readers · Privacy officers · Policy