PrivacySignal
AI Governance

I turned off my algorithm for 24 hours. Is this how social media used to be?

The Guardian — Tech · · International · AI Governance

A writer used a little-known Instagram feature to disable their algorithmic feed for 24 hours, testing what chronological, unfiltered social media felt like before recommendation systems took over. The experiment came as Australia announced regulatory reforms targeting social media platforms.

Why this matters: Algorithms decide what you see, in what order, and for how long. Most people have never used social media without one. That matters because the feed is not neutral — it is built to keep you engaged, and engagement often means outrage, envy, or anxiety. Turning it off is a small act, but it makes visible something most platforms work hard to keep invisible: that you are not really the customer. You are the product being optimized.

Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy · Privacy officers

This summary is AI-assisted and may contain errors. It is an original briefing to help you gauge significance quickly — not a reproduction of the source. Always read the linked original before relying on it. See our methodology.

Analysis

All analysis →

Weekly Editorial Analysis from Experts and Editors

Related stories

AI Governance
The Guardian — Tech · · International

Anthropic details bad actors’ efforts to misuse its AI for bioweapons

Anthropic released a 154-page threat intelligence report documenting serious misuse attempts against its AI models, including efforts by criminals, state-backed groups, spyware vendors, and others to develop bioweapons, design weapons, and surveil political dissidents. The company described these as the most significant and novel threat cases it has identified.

Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#ai-governance#surveillance#ai Read original →
AI Governance
The Guardian — Tech · · International

More Anthropic researchers warn of AI’s perils as Musk terms fears a ‘psyop’

Insiders at the firm fear tech’s advancement could cause human extinction while others are calling it a ‘setup’ A day after a former researcher at Anthropic made an apocalyptic declaration about artificial intelligence, more researchers and staff members at the AI startup publicly agreed with him and posted their own dire warnings. In response, Elon Musk and other conservative figures on X, formerly Twitter, called the chorus of concerns a “setup” and a “psyop”. Continue reading...

Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy

#ai-governance#ai Read original →
News
WIRED — AI · · International

Is AI Actually Going to Kill Us All?

This week on “Uncanny Valley,” we dig into a former Anthropic researcher’s AI doomsday warning, the latest upgrades from Apple’s event, and the census report that claimed Trump won the 2020 election.

Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy

News
CyberScoop · · US Federal

AI lets small actors run state-level hacking campaigns, Anthropic report finds

The report details a Russian-aligned espionage campaign against more than 20 organizations, an exploit foundry run by Chinese undergraduates and ShinyHunters-affiliated breaches, among other disrupted operations. The post AI lets small actors run state-level hacking campaigns, Anthropic report finds appeared first on CyberScoop.

Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy

#ai#security Read original →