PrivacySignal
AI Governance

No hiding in plain text: the EU AI Act's transparency rules are now in force

Lexology · · International · AI Governance

The EU AI Act's transparency provisions have taken effect, requiring companies deploying certain AI systems to be open about how those systems work and when people are interacting with them. This marks the first major set of the law's obligations to become legally binding.

Why this matters: If you have ever talked to a chatbot without knowing it was one, or seen AI-generated content presented as something else, these rules are aimed at that. Companies now have a legal obligation to tell people when they are interacting with AI. That sounds basic. It has not been the norm. The real test is enforcement. Rules that exist only on paper protect nobody, and the EU has a habit of writing strong laws and then moving slowly when companies push back.

Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy

This summary is AI-assisted and may contain errors. It is an original briefing to help you gauge significance quickly — not a reproduction of the source. Always read the linked original before relying on it. See our methodology.

Analysis

All analysis →

Weekly Editorial Analysis from Experts and Editors

Logged Is Not Authorized

Georgia law restricts police use of license plate data to law enforcement purposes. A new lawsuit alleges deputies searched a man's vehicle five times while he was suing their sheriff. Two recorded reasons were "info" and "37." The system accepted both.

· 6 min read Read →
Deep Signal · Part I of III

The Algorithm Said So

Federal rulemakers are deciding what to do when artificial intelligence produces the kind of conclusion that once required an expert. They disagree about how to regulate it. They also disagree about whether the problem has arrived.

· 10 min read Read →

Related stories

AI Governance
K Kennedys Law LLP · · International

AI regulation: The EU–US sovereignty contest

The European Union and the United States are engaged in a broader contest over who sets the rules for artificial intelligence, with regulatory approaches on each side reflecting deeper questions about sovereignty and control over global technology.

Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy

#ai-governance#regulation#ai Read original →