PrivacySignal
Enforcement

The High Crime of “LMAO”: How Cops Are Treating Mass Surveillance As a Joke

EFF — Deeplinks · · International · Enforcement

An investigation found that police officers are routinely entering meaningless or joke entries — like 'idk' or 'LMAO' — into the required justification fields when querying automated license plate reader networks that can pull data from tens of thousands of cameras at once. The findings suggest that audit logging requirements, meant to provide accountability for mass surveillance tools, are being ignored in practice.

Why this matters: License plate readers do not just clock one car. A single query can touch data from millions of vehicles across thousands of cameras. The only thing standing between that power and abuse is a paper trail — officers writing down why they searched. That trail is apparently a joke, sometimes literally. Logging requirements only mean something if someone checks them and there are real consequences for ignoring them. Right now it looks like neither is happening. That is not a technical problem. It is an accountability problem, and it belongs to the agencies buying these systems and the city councils approving them.

Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

This summary is AI-assisted and may contain errors. It is an original briefing to help you gauge significance quickly — not a reproduction of the source. Always read the linked original before relying on it. See our methodology.

Analysis

All analysis →

Weekly Editorial Analysis from Experts and Editors

Logged Is Not Authorized

Georgia law restricts police use of license plate data to law enforcement purposes. A new lawsuit alleges deputies searched a man's vehicle five times while he was suing their sheriff. Two recorded reasons were "info" and "37." The system accepted both.

· 6 min read Read →
Deep Signal · Part I of III

The Algorithm Said So

Federal rulemakers are deciding what to do when artificial intelligence produces the kind of conclusion that once required an expert. They disagree about how to regulate it. They also disagree about whether the problem has arrived.

· 10 min read Read →

Related stories

Enforcement
T The Hill · · International

35 states, DC reach $220M settlement with General Motors over driver data privacy

General Motors has agreed to a $220 million settlement with 35 states and Washington, D.C. over allegations that it mishandled driver data privacy. The multistate action represents one of the larger consumer privacy settlements involving an automaker.

Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · Policy

#enforcement#privacy Read original →