The Logical End Point of AI Job Interviews Is Two Bots Talking to Each Other
A job seeker frustrated with AI-driven recruitment processes used ChatGPT to conduct his interviews on his behalf, letting one automated system respond to another. The exchange points to a broader pattern in hiring where automation on both sides is quietly removing humans from what was once a human conversation.
Why this matters: When companies use AI to screen candidates, candidates start using AI to answer. That is a predictable response. But it hollows out hiring in ways that should bother employers and workers alike. Recruiters lose any real signal about who a person is. Candidates burn time performing for a bot that is not making the actual decision. And the whole process becomes a game of whose AI sounds better. If hiring is now just two systems talking, you have to ask who the process is actually for.
Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy
This summary is AI-assisted and may contain errors. It is an original briefing to help you gauge significance quickly — not a reproduction of the source. Always read the linked original before relying on it. See our methodology.