PrivacySignal
News

The Pokémon Company announces it will reopen mega store, adds facial recognition to all national stores

GamesHub · · International · Surveillance & Civil Liberties

The Pokémon Company has announced plans to reopen its mega store and will deploy facial recognition technology across all of its national retail locations. The move marks a significant expansion of biometric surveillance into what is primarily a consumer entertainment and merchandise environment.

Why this matters: Buying a Pikachu plush should not mean submitting your face to a corporate database. Facial recognition in retail is not neutral infrastructure — it collects biometric data from everyone who walks in, including kids, whether they know it or not. The Pokémon brand runs on families and children. That makes the choice to add facial recognition more consequential, not less. The real issue is what data gets stored, how long it is kept, who it is shared with, and what happens when it is wrong about someone.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

This summary is AI-assisted and may contain errors. It is an original briefing to help you gauge significance quickly — not a reproduction of the source. Always read the linked original before relying on it. See our methodology.

Related stories

News
EFF — Deeplinks · · International

San Francisco: Don’t Fall for Industry Defense of Surveillance Pricing

The concept of “surveillance pricing” is just one part of a much larger problem and business model: corporations maximizing their profits by invading our privacy. The all-too-common business model is to systematically harvest, collate, and store as much of our personal data as possible, and then monetize it through use and sale. When it comes to surveillance pricing, that looks like corporations offering the same product to two different people at two different prices, based on harvested personal information. That's why EFF supports A.B. 2654, authored by Assemblymember Chris Ward, which bans…

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#surveillance#privacy Read original →
News
Nextgov/FCW · · US Federal

FCC blocks approval of new foreign-made robots, power inverters

National security agencies said the devices could create supply-chain vulnerabilities, threaten critical infrastructure and enable surveillance or remote manipulation.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy

#surveillance#ai#privacy#security Read original →
News
EFF — Deeplinks · · International

Why Are Gay Bars Building Databases of Their Patrons?

Recent reports have raised alarm about the use of PatronScan, an ID-checking and face-scanning system, at multiple LGBTQ+ bars in San Francisco’s Castro neighborhood. Much of the attention has focused on reports that the system photographs patrons as they enter venues and questions about whether those images are used for facial recognition. A broader privacy concern also deserves scrutiny. For years, PatronScan has marketed itself not just as an ID-verification tool, but as a system that allows bars and clubs to identify patrons, keep records about them, and share information across venues. A…

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#surveillance#privacy Read original →
News
Schneier on Security · · International

Axon Is Another License Plate Surveillance Company

Some local governments are moving away from Flock's license plate reader networks, but switching to a competitor like Axon does not meaningfully reduce surveillance. Axon's cameras reportedly collect personal data well beyond license plate numbers, raising similar concerns about the scope of information gathered on ordinary drivers.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#surveillance#privacy Read original →