PrivacySignal
Analysis ← Front page
AI Governance

To be truly participative, stakeholder involvement should follow an AI system’s entire lifecycle

OECD AI Policy Observatory · · International · AI Governance

An OECD analysis argues that meaningful participation in AI governance requires more than one-time consultation, calling instead for community authority and structured oversight spanning an AI system's full lifecycle — from design through deployment and decommissioning.

Why this matters: Without sustained stakeholder involvement, affected communities — including those most vulnerable to algorithmic harm or surveillance — have little recourse once systems are live, leaving rights protections dependent on developer goodwill rather than accountable governance structures.

Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy

#ai-governance#ai
Read the original at OECD AI Policy Observatory → Browse the archive

This summary is AI-assisted and may contain errors. It is an original briefing to help you gauge significance quickly — not a reproduction of the source. Always read the linked original before relying on it. See our methodology.

Analysis

All analysis →

Weekly Editorial Analysis from Experts and Editors

Related stories

News
Schneier on Security · · International

AI Genie in the Wild

When I give talks about AI genies, I use this sort of example as a hypothetical. It’s happened. The story is from Australia. Someone named Andrew tasked OpenClaw to book gym classes for him. And…. Minutes later, his AI agent reported it had discovered a way to book Andrew into classes several weeks in advance, far beyond what was supposed to be possible. Andrew, who was sitting fourth on a waitlist for a class later that week, asked if it was possible to move him to the top of the list. The agent came back and told Andrew that it had kicked another gym-goer off the list as part of the testing…

Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy

#ai Read original →
News
CyberScoop · · US Federal

NIST wants to overhaul its vulnerability database for the AI age

NIST is seeking public input to modernize the National Vulnerability Database to keep pace with AI-driven cyber threats and machine-scale security data. The post NIST wants to overhaul its vulnerability database for the AI age appeared first on CyberScoop.

Who should care: General readers · AI governance · Policy

#ai#security Read original →
AI Governance
J JD Supra · · International

AI Regulation in Flux: U.S. and global shift toward “lighter touch”

Regulatory momentum around artificial intelligence is shifting in the United States and internationally toward less prescriptive oversight, a trend that analysts are tracking as governments reassess how tightly to govern the technology.

Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy

#ai-governance#regulation#ai Read original →
AI Governance
New York Times — Tech · · International

His Start-Up’s Goal: A.I. That Is Trainable and Not Controlled by a Big Company

A co-founder of xAI has launched a new startup focused on building open-source AI systems, with the stated aim of giving individuals and organizations the ability to train and control AI on their own terms rather than relying on large technology companies.

Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy

#ai-governance#ai Read original →
AI Governance
The Guardian — Tech · · International

Spotify to distinguish AI artists from real people – and stop recommending them

Spotify is introducing an 'AI persona' label to identify AI-generated artist identities on profiles and track listings. The platform will also exclude these acts from its algorithmic recommendations, separating them from human artists in how music gets surfaced to listeners.

Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy · Privacy officers

#ai-governance#ai#privacy Read original →