The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
401 results · page 10 of 17
The Premier League is providing funding to London police to deploy facial recognition technology at football matches. The arrangement represents a private sports organization directly financing law enforcement surveillance infrastructure.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Flock Safety, a company that sells automated license plate reader networks to law enforcement agencies, announced security changes following reports of officers misusing the system and a wave of public criticism.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance
Flock Safety, which sells license plate reader and surveillance tools to law enforcement agencies, announced it is making a new feature called 'Audit Assistance' mandatory for all customers, saying it has already helped identify officer misconduct. The company has not publicly explained how the tool works or what metrics it uses to flag potential abuse.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
California's privacy regulator has announced a second enforcement action against a data broker within a single week, signaling an acceleration of regulatory pressure on the industry under state law.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Flock Safety's CEO announced new steps to limit misuse of the company's license plate reader network after reports that law enforcement used the system to track immigrants and people traveling across state lines for abortions. The company had previously left key privacy controls optional, and many police departments never enabled them.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A state privacy regulator has issued its second enforcement decision against an out-of-state data broker, signaling continued regulatory action beyond its own borders. The decision adds to a pattern of state-level agencies asserting jurisdiction over companies that collect and sell resident data regardless of where those companies are based.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · Policy
The EU's data protection authority has raised concerns that proposed reforms to Europol's data handling rules could erode privacy rights. The watchdog's warning suggests the changes may expand the law enforcement agency's ability to process personal data in ways that conflict with existing protections.
Who should care: General readers · Privacy officers · Policy
The CEO of Flock Safety, a license plate reader company widely used by U.S. law enforcement, has acknowledged the company was too slow to respond to officers misusing its surveillance technology to track romantic partners, in some cases leading to officers resigning.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
The European Data Protection Supervisor has issued a formal opinion on the European Commission's proposal to revise and replace the existing regulation governing Europol, the EU's law enforcement agency.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · AI governance · Compliance
Residents in North Carolina are pushing back against Flock Safety license plate reader cameras, with a public dispute underway between community members and law enforcement over how the surveillance technology is being used.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · Policy
California regulators have issued the first enforcement action under the state's Delete Act, fining an Iowa-based data broker more than $100,000. The penalty marks the first time authorities have used the law, which gives Californians the right to request deletion of their data from brokers.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · Policy
A set of transparency requirements under the EU AI Act took effect on 2 August, marking one of the regulation's first concrete enforcement milestones. The rules affect how certain AI systems must be disclosed or labeled to users and the public.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Louisiana's Data Privacy Act is approaching enforcement, prompting businesses operating in the state to assess their compliance posture. The law represents Louisiana's entry into the growing field of state-level consumer data protection.
Who should care: General readers · Privacy officers · Policy
A California privacy agency has announced its first enforcement action against a data broker, marking an early test of the state's regulatory power over companies that collect and sell personal information.
Who should care: General readers · Privacy officers · Policy
California's privacy regulator has filed its first enforcement action against a data broker under both the California Consumer Privacy Act and the Delete Act, marking a significant step in the state's use of its data broker oversight tools.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Moscow police beat a 15-year-old boy after an AI-powered facial recognition system incorrectly identified him as a drug suspect. The incident, reported by Meduza, illustrates the real-world consequences of misidentification by automated surveillance tools used by law enforcement.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
IBM has introduced Enforcement Tracking for watsonx Orchestrate, a feature designed to move AI governance beyond written policy into verifiable, documented compliance. The tool appears aimed at giving organizations a way to show that governance rules are actually being followed, not just recorded.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity
A data broker has agreed to pay $116,000 to settle violations of the California Consumer Privacy Act and the Delete Act, in an enforcement action by the California Privacy Protection Agency. The case marks one of the early uses of the Delete Act, which requires data brokers to honor deletion requests made through a central state-run system.
Who should care: General readers · Privacy officers · Policy
California has issued its first fine against a data broker under state privacy law, marking an enforcement milestone for a regulatory framework that has been on the books for years.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Flock Safety's license plate-reading cameras, now deployed by thousands of U.S. law enforcement agencies, have become a flashpoint for civil liberties organizations who oppose their widespread use. The cameras automatically read and log plate data, building a detailed record of vehicle movements across communities.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Ireland's Data Protection Commission handled a complaint in which a job applicant requested that a prospective employer erase their personal data, and the employer failed to comply. The case reflects ongoing enforcement of individuals' right to erasure under data protection law.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · Policy
California's privacy agency discussed enforcement of the Delete Request and Opt-out Platform (DROP) program alongside a potential increase in fees charged to registered data brokers. The conversations reflect ongoing efforts to operationalize California's data broker deletion framework.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Immigration and Customs Enforcement is reportedly purchasing access to credit card records through data brokers, according to the headline and excerpt. The data in question is the personal information consumers provided when applying for credit.
Who should care: General readers · Privacy officers · Policy
The EU AI Act is entering its early enforcement phase, and analysts are beginning to map out what transparency requirements will actually look like in practice during the first year. Regulated entities and regulators alike are working out how obligations will be interpreted and applied.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · AI governance · Administrators · General readers · Policy