PrivacySignal
← Front page

Search & browse the archive

The full corpus — beyond today's front page.

Reset

723 results · page 21 of 31

Enforcement
EDPB · · EU

Imposition of fine on a telecommunications company for violations of data subject’s rights

Background information Date of final decision: 11 February 2026 National case Controller: Vodafone-Panafon S.A Hellenic Telecommunications Company Legal Reference: Article 12: Transparent information, communication and modalities for the exercise of the rights of the data subject, Article 12.2: Facilitation of the exercise of the rights of the data subject, Article 12.3: Time limit for responding to a request, Article 12.4: Information to be provided where no action is taken on the request, Article 15: Right of access by the data subject, Article 18: Right to restriction of processing Decisio…

Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance

#enforcement Read original →
Breach
EDPB · · EU

The Italian SA fined Poste Vita for data breach

Italy's data protection authority issued an administrative fine against insurance firm Poste Vita S.p.A. following a customer complaint alleging unauthorized disclosure of personal data. The regulator found violations of GDPR principles governing data processing and breach-notification obligations.

Why this matters: The case underscores that insurers hold sensitive personal and financial data, and failures to secure or promptly report breaches leave individuals exposed without timely recourse — a reminder that notification rules exist to protect people, not just satisfy regulators.

Who should care: Cybersecurity · Privacy officers · Administrators · Lawyers · Compliance

#breach#enforcement Read original →
Enforcement
EDPB · · EU

The Italian SA imposed a 40 000 EUR fine on a company for violating the confidentiality of a employee's email account after the end of his employment

Italy's data protection authority fined LTL S.p.A. €40,000 for accessing a former employee's work email account after his employment ended, breaching GDPR principles on lawful processing, transparency, and the individual's right to access his own data.

Why this matters: The case underscores that workplace email accounts retain personal-data protections even after someone leaves a job — and that continued employer access without notice or legal basis can constitute a civil-liberties violation, not merely a compliance lapse.

Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance

#enforcement#regulation Read original →
Enforcement
F FOX 10 Phoenix · · International

Amazon sued over Ring facial recognition technology

Amazon is facing a lawsuit related to the use of facial recognition technology in its Ring devices, raising legal questions about how the company collects and processes biometric data through its consumer surveillance products.

Why this matters: Facial recognition embedded in widely deployed home security cameras represents a significant expansion of biometric surveillance into residential spaces, where individuals — including neighbors and passersby — have no notice or opportunity to consent to identification.

Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#enforcement#surveillance#privacy Read original →
Enforcement
Y Yahoo · · International

Amazon sued over Ring facial recognition technology

Amazon is facing a lawsuit related to the use of facial recognition technology in its Ring product line. The legal action raises questions about how biometric data captured by Ring devices is collected, processed, and retained.

Why this matters: Doorbell cameras already extend surveillance into public and semi-public spaces; adding facial recognition compounds that reach, potentially enabling persistent, warrantless identification of individuals without their knowledge or consent.

Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#enforcement#surveillance#privacy Read original →
Enforcement
F FOX 5 Atlanta · · International

Amazon sued over Ring facial recognition technology

Amazon is facing a lawsuit related to the alleged use of facial recognition technology in its Ring home security products, according to reporting from FOX 5 Atlanta.

Why this matters: If Ring devices are collecting biometric facial data, millions of households could be generating continuous identity surveillance streams — raising serious concerns about warrantless biometric capture and the adequacy of consumer consent in home security contexts.

Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#enforcement#surveillance#privacy Read original →
AI Governance
I Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) · · International

ITI Reacts to the Great American AI Act

ITI Reacts to the Great American AI Act  Information Technology Industry Council (ITI)

Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy

#ai-governance#ai Read original →
Enforcement
U USA Today · · International

Amazon sued over Ring facial recognition, plaintiffs seeking $5M

Amazon is facing a lawsuit alleging its Ring devices engaged in unauthorized facial recognition, with plaintiffs seeking $5 million in damages. The case targets biometric data practices tied to Ring's home security camera ecosystem.

Why this matters: Biometric data — unlike passwords — cannot be changed once compromised, making unauthorized facial recognition particularly high-stakes for individuals. The suit may test whether consumers have meaningful legal recourse when surveillance hardware collects sensitive data without clear consent.

Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#enforcement#surveillance#privacy Read original →
← Prev Page 21 of 31 Next →