The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
579 results · page 6 of 25
A piece in Global Policy Journal argues that AI governance frameworks must account for gender, suggesting that policies designed without this lens risk embedding or amplifying existing inequalities into automated systems.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
A shift is underway in AI governance, moving beyond simply monitoring what AI systems do toward demonstrating verifiable control over their behavior and outputs.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
A piece published in Hungarian Conservative addresses what it characterizes as a gap in AI governance, pointing to unresolved questions about how artificial intelligence is overseen and regulated.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
AI governance efforts are struggling to keep pace with rapid developments across multiple fronts, including copyright, privacy, and the rise of autonomous AI agents. The breadth of issues suggests regulators and policymakers are trying to catch up across several distinct problem areas at once.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy · Privacy officers
Wolters Kluwer has published a piece arguing that AI governance has become essential for financial services firms, reflecting growing industry attention to how AI is managed, audited, and controlled in regulated sectors.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
Regulatory momentum around AI is drawing investor and market attention to identity and access management company Okta, along with the broader category of AI governance software. The connection reflects growing expectation that AI rules will create demand for compliance and oversight tools.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
UNESCO held a session reinforcing international cooperation on ethical AI governance. The meeting focused on aligning countries around shared principles for how AI should be developed and used responsibly.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
An Arizona State University piece argues that small businesses in Arizona should have meaningful input in shaping AI policy decisions that affect them. The piece appears to advocate for broader stakeholder representation beyond large corporations in AI governance conversations.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
AI governance experts have responded publicly to escalating warnings about existential risks from advanced AI and renewed calls for regulatory action. The reactions reflect an ongoing debate among specialists about how seriously to take worst-case scenarios and what policy tools are appropriate.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
AI governance is shifting from policy documents and boardroom discussions into the day-to-day tools and processes that workers actually use.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
MSPAlliance has released version 4.0 of its Unified Certification Standard, which adds AI governance requirements for managed service providers. The updated standard sets expectations for how MSPs should handle AI-related risks and responsibilities.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
Truyo, a privacy and AI governance software company, has introduced a warranty program tied to its compliance and governance platforms. The program appears designed to give customers some form of guarantee around the performance or reliability of those tools.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy · Privacy officers
Professor Yonathan Arbel, based at the University of Miami, works at the intersection of private law, AI governance, and how artificial intelligence is reshaping legal practice.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
Companies are bypassing their own AI governance policies even as concerns about AI risk grow, according to reporting by CIO Dive. The gap between stated policy and actual practice suggests internal controls are not keeping pace with AI adoption.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
AI governance requirements are creating new pressure on financial controls, as organizations work to align emerging AI oversight frameworks with existing financial accountability structures.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
A University of Illinois Chicago expert is available to speak with media about AI governance, innovation, and competitiveness. The announcement does not describe a specific event or policy development.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
The US and China remain far apart on any shared framework for regulating artificial intelligence, with no bilateral agreement on AI governance currently in prospect.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · Compliance · General readers · Policy
An AI governance expert is calling for each AI agent deployed in enterprise environments to be assigned its own distinct identity and paired with a dedicated kill switch for rapid shutdown. The recommendation reflects growing concern about how organizations manage access and accountability as AI agents multiply across workflows.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
EY has published a report arguing that AI governance has moved into a new phase focused on closing what it calls a 'confidence gap' — the distance between how organizations deploy AI and how much trust stakeholders actually place in it.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
New York City's Public Advocate has released a report examining AI governance in the city. The report's scope and specific findings were not detailed in available information.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
A new argument circulating in European policy media warns that confining global AI governance to a two-power dynamic between the United States and China leaves the rest of the world without meaningful input on one of the most consequential technological decisions of the decade.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
Aetna's chief technology officer discussed the insurer's approach to using AI in prior authorization decisions and how the company governs those systems. The conversation touches on one of the most consequential uses of AI in American healthcare.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
A new EY survey found that organizations are deploying autonomous AI systems faster than they are building governance structures to oversee them, creating a gap between what AI can do and what controls exist to manage it.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy
South Carolina lawmakers have launched an 18-month effort to develop state-level artificial intelligence policy. The initiative signals a deliberate, long-term approach to AI governance rather than rushed legislation.
Who should care: AI governance · Lawyers · Administrators · General readers · Policy