The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
5 results
California has issued its first fine against a data broker under state privacy law, marking an enforcement milestone for a regulatory framework that has been on the books for years.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Privacy experts are warning that AI systems can now infer sensitive personal information from seemingly innocuous data at a speed and scale that existing state privacy laws were not designed to address. The gap between what AI can deduce and what regulations currently protect is widening.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
New York Attorney General Letitia James, joined by a bipartisan coalition of 42 other state attorneys general, reached an $18 million settlement with genetic testing company 23andMe over its failure to adequately protect customers' genetic data. California's attorney general has filed a separate lawsuit against the company under state privacy law.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · Policy
Connecticut has amended its state privacy law for the third time, adding new requirements around data brokering, personalized pricing, facial recognition technology, and the sale of geolocation data. The changes expand the scope of obligations on businesses that collect and monetize personal information about Connecticut residents.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Connecticut has amended its state privacy law to add new rules covering facial recognition technology and age assurance requirements. The changes extend the law's reach into biometric data practices and the ways platforms verify user age.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy