PrivacySignal
← Front page
News

Yes to California's Bill to Ban Surveillance Pricing

EFF — Deeplinks · · International · Surveillance & Civil Liberties

Corporations harvest and monetize ever-growing amounts of our personal data, such as our browsing history and physical location. One bitter fruit of this poisonous tree is known as “surveillance pricing”: corporations offer the same product to two different people at two different prices, based on scrutiny of these people’s respective personal data. Surveillance pricing is bad for privacy, equity, and price transparency. So EFF supports a California bill, S.B. 2564, which would ban this creepy practice. How Surveillance Pricing Works In 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) published a rep…

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#surveillance#privacy
Read the original at EFF — Deeplinks → Browse the archive

This summary is AI-assisted and may contain errors. It is an original briefing to help you gauge significance quickly — not a reproduction of the source. Always read the linked original before relying on it. See our methodology.

Related stories

News
K Kansas City Star · · International

What to know about the KCATA facial recognition plan on public buses | Porter

The Kansas City Area Transportation Authority is reportedly planning to deploy facial recognition technology on public buses. The proposal would subject transit riders to biometric surveillance as a condition of using public transportation.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#surveillance#privacy Read original →
News
K Kansas City Star · · International

Let facial recognition cameras on buses have a trial run before opposing | Opinion

An opinion piece in the Kansas City Star argues that facial recognition cameras on buses should be given a trial period before critics push back. The piece frames opposition as premature, suggesting deployment and evaluation should come before public debate.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#surveillance#privacy Read original →
News
M Mashable · · International

ACLU and other organizations warn Meta against adding facial recognition to smart glasses

The ACLU and allied organizations have sent a warning to Meta urging the company not to integrate facial recognition technology into its smart glasses products. The groups are raising concerns before such a capability is built in, rather than after.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#surveillance#privacy Read original →
News
B Biometric Update · · International

Ottawa police take first steps towards using Idemia facial recognition

Ottawa police have begun initial steps to adopt facial recognition technology from Idemia, a major biometrics vendor. The move signals the department's intent to integrate automated face-matching tools into its investigative operations.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy

#surveillance#privacy Read original →
News
CyberScoop · · US Federal

Someone infected a spyware probe overseer with spyware

Citizen Lab says the phone of a member of Europe’s PEGA Committee was infected twice with Pegasus, the NSO Group spyware that gave the panel its name. The post Someone infected a spyware probe overseer with spyware appeared first on CyberScoop.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity

#surveillance Read original →
News
B Biometric Update · · International

Clearview AI FedRAMP bid could ease federal procurement of facial recognition

Clearview AI is pursuing FedRAMP authorization, a federal security certification that would make it significantly easier for U.S. government agencies to procure its facial recognition services. Achieving that status would remove a key procurement barrier and open a broad path into federal contracts.

Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy

#surveillance#ai#privacy Read original →