The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
642 results · page 26 of 27
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which authorizes warrantless collection of foreign communications and routinely captures Americans' messages, emails, and calls in the process, expired on June 12, 2026 after Congress failed to reach agreement on a longer reauthorization.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A man has come forward to describe being wrongfully arrested by Jacksonville Beach Police after facial recognition technology misidentified him as a suspect. The case adds to a growing record of false matches from AI-based identification tools used in law enforcement.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Police forces in England are significantly expanding their use of facial recognition technology, according to reporting from Statewatch. The growth reflects a broader shift toward biometric surveillance in public law enforcement across the country.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Charlotte Douglas International Airport is piloting self-service security gates that use facial recognition technology to verify travelers. The test represents a step toward biometric-based screening in domestic airport infrastructure.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A man is speaking out after being wrongfully arrested by Jacksonville Beach Police following a facial recognition match that pointed to him as a suspect. The case adds to a documented pattern of facial recognition technology producing misidentifications that lead to real arrests and serious consequences for innocent people.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has announced its support for California's S.B. 2564, a bill that would ban surveillance pricing — the practice of charging different customers different prices for the same product based on their personal data, such as browsing history or location.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A Florida man was wrongfully arrested after a facial recognition system incorrectly matched him to a suspect. The case adds to a documented pattern of misidentifications tied to automated facial recognition tools used in law enforcement.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Police in Peterborough are set to deploy live facial recognition cameras again, continuing a pattern of rolling out the technology in UK public spaces. The move brings the surveillance system back to a city where it has been used before.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Charlotte Douglas International Airport is piloting facial recognition-powered e-Gates designed to accelerate the TSA PreCheck screening process. The trial represents an expansion of biometric identity verification into mainstream domestic air travel infrastructure.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
The Electronic Frontier Foundation reports that automated license plate reader networks, marketed as public safety tools, are increasingly being used by authorities for minor infractions such as noise complaints, effectively functioning as broad population-tracking systems rather than targeted investigative tools.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A wrongful arrest lawsuit is drawing renewed attention to police use of facial recognition technology, prompting scrutiny of how law enforcement agencies deploy the tools and the errors they can produce. The case adds to a growing record of people arrested based on faulty algorithmic matches.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A Florida man claims he was wrongfully arrested after law enforcement relied on AI-powered facial recognition technology to identify him as a suspect, which he contends produced an erroneous match.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Meta has removed code enabling facial recognition from the app connected to its Ray-Ban smart glasses. The move follows public scrutiny after researchers demonstrated that the glasses could be used to identify strangers in real time.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
The messaging giant announced that it disrupted a phishing campaign targeting its users with NSO’s spyware.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity
Meta has reversed course on facial recognition functionality within its AI application, scaling back or removing the feature after its introduction drew scrutiny.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Advances in AI are making facial recognition systems significantly more accurate and capable of identifying individuals in more challenging conditions. The technology is becoming faster, more scalable, and harder to evade as underlying models improve.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Meta has reportedly added facial recognition capabilities to its smart glasses, according to a new report. The feature was not prominently disclosed to users or the public at the time it was introduced.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
A report claims Meta quietly built facial recognition capabilities into its smart glasses, integrating the technology without public disclosure. The development suggests the wearable devices can identify people in the physical world using their faces.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Connecticut has updated its privacy law with several new provisions, including rules for data brokers, a ban on selling geolocation data, restrictions on using surveillance-based data for pricing, and new requirements around genetic data. The changes expand the state's existing consumer privacy framework across several high-sensitivity data categories.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Meta has embedded facial recognition code into its app in connection with its smart glasses, characterizing the move as exploratory rather than an active feature rollout. The addition was not publicly announced and came to light through outside observation.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Congress faces a June 12 deadline to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which allows the NSA to collect and store communications involving Americans without a warrant. The deadline coincides with scrutiny over the Trump administration's appointment of an acting Director of National Intelligence seen as lacking relevant qualifications.
Who should care: Lawyers · Compliance · Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
The Electronic Frontier Foundation testified before a House Homeland Security subcommittee, urging Congress to pair any government adoption of AI with explicit safeguards for constitutional rights. EFF's senior policy analyst warned that using generative AI for mass government surveillance could amplify existing civil liberties violations at a scale previously impossible.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Meta embedded facial recognition code in the software powering its always-on Ray-Ban smart glasses, capable of generating unique faceprints from a person's facial features. Following public scrutiny and critical reporting by WIRED, Meta removed the unactivated code in a subsequent app update.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Police departments in Northeast Ohio are increasing their use of facial recognition technology in investigations. A local attorney has raised concerns about the practice, signaling legal and civil liberties tensions around how the technology is being deployed.
Who should care: Privacy officers · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy