The full corpus — beyond today's front page.
59 results · page 2 of 3
Media advisory
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · AI governance · Policy
Amazon's Ring division is facing a lawsuit related to its use of facial recognition technology, according to a report from WAVY.com. Specific allegations and plaintiffs have not been detailed in the available excerpt.
Why this matters: Facial recognition integrated into consumer doorbell cameras raises serious concerns about warrantless biometric surveillance of public and residential spaces, with legal challenges potentially setting precedents for how such data may be collected, retained, and shared with law enforcement.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Background information Date of final decision: 10 July 2025 National case Controller: Magna PT S.p.A.Legal Reference(s): Article 5 (Principles relating to processing of personal data), Article 6 (Lawfulness of processing), Article 9 (Processing of special categories of personal data), Article 13 (Information to be provided where personal data are collected from the data subject) Decision: Administrative fine, Definitive ban on data processing Key words: Administrative fine, Principles relating to processing of personal data, Transparency,Retention time, Lawfulness of processing, E…
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance
Background information Date of final decision: 27 November 2025 National case Controller: Pioneer Hi-Bred Italia Sementi s.r.l.Legal Reference(s): Article 5 (Principles relating to processing of personal data), Article 6 (Lawfulness of processing), Article 13 (Information to be provided where personal data are collected from the data subject), Article 28 (Processor), Article 88 Decision: Administrative fine, Compliance order, Erasure order Key words: Administrative fine, Principles relating to processing of personal data, Lawfulness of processing, Transparency, D…
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity
Background information Date of final decision: 11 February 2026 National case Controller: Vodafone-Panafon S.A Hellenic Telecommunications Company Legal Reference: Article 12: Transparent information, communication and modalities for the exercise of the rights of the data subject, Article 12.2: Facilitation of the exercise of the rights of the data subject, Article 12.3: Time limit for responding to a request, Article 12.4: Information to be provided where no action is taken on the request, Article 15: Right of access by the data subject, Article 18: Right to restriction of processing Decisio…
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance
Background information Date of final decision: 18 December 2025 National case Controller: LTL S.p.A.Legal Reference(s): Article 5 (Principles relating to processing of personal data), Article 12 (Transparent information, communication and modalities for the exercise of the rights of the data subject), Article 15 (Right to access by the data subject) Decision: Administrative fine, Compliance order, Erasure order or Add here your free text for the decision Key words: Administrative fine, Principles relating to processing of personal data, Transparency,Right of access, &nb…
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance
Amazon is facing a lawsuit related to the use of facial recognition technology in its Ring product line. The legal action raises questions about how biometric data captured by Ring devices is collected, processed, and retained.
Why this matters: Doorbell cameras already extend surveillance into public and semi-public spaces; adding facial recognition compounds that reach, potentially enabling persistent, warrantless identification of individuals without their knowledge or consent.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Amazon is facing a lawsuit related to the alleged use of facial recognition technology in its Ring home security products, according to reporting from FOX 5 Atlanta.
Why this matters: If Ring devices are collecting biometric facial data, millions of households could be generating continuous identity surveillance streams — raising serious concerns about warrantless biometric capture and the adequacy of consumer consent in home security contexts.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Amazon is facing a lawsuit alleging its Ring devices engaged in unauthorized facial recognition, with plaintiffs seeking $5 million in damages. The case targets biometric data practices tied to Ring's home security camera ecosystem.
Why this matters: Biometric data — unlike passwords — cannot be changed once compromised, making unauthorized facial recognition particularly high-stakes for individuals. The suit may test whether consumers have meaningful legal recourse when surveillance hardware collects sensitive data without clear consent.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Amazon faces lawsuit over Ring facial recognition software CBS News
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Amazon faces class action lawsuit over Ring facial-recognition feature TechCrunch
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance
Amazon Ring is facing a federal lawsuit challenging its facial recognition capabilities, escalating an ongoing privacy dispute into the federal court system. The case centers on whether Ring's biometric features violate individuals' privacy rights.
Why this matters: Doorbell cameras with facial recognition extend surveillance infrastructure into neighborhoods, collecting biometric data on passersby without their consent. A federal ruling could set significant precedent for how biometric privacy protections apply to consumer-grade surveillance devices.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Amazon's Ring is facing a lawsuit targeting its facial recognition feature, adding to a string of privacy-related legal challenges confronting the doorbell camera company.
Why this matters: Doorbell-based facial recognition extends biometric surveillance into residential spaces, raising concerns about warrantless identification of individuals in public and private contexts — with implications for neighbors and passersby who never consented to being scanned.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Amazon Ring sued over facial recognition The Hill
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Cybersecurity · General readers · Policy
Thought for the week: Spark for the US DOJ Rule enforcement and/or new legislation? IAPP
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance
Saints to sinners: A penalty taken for 'spygate' IAPP
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance
France's data protection authority CNIL has imposed a €5 million fine on IQVIA, a healthcare data and analytics company, for violations related to the handling of health data.
Why this matters: Health data ranks among the most sensitive personal information, and this enforcement action signals that regulators are willing to impose meaningful financial penalties on commercial data brokers who profit from processing it without adequate legal safeguards.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · Healthcare professionals
The Markup and CalMatters showed how website code could make it harder for Californians to exercise their right to remove personal data. Now much of that code has disappeared.
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · Policy
TAKE IT DOWN Act: How to comply as the FTC begins enforcement IAPP
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance
Glasgow-based energy company fined £160,000 for making unsolicited marketing calls Information Commissioner's Office
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance
The Federal Trade Commission today began enforcing the TAKE IT DOWN Act (TIDA), a law requiring platforms, at the request of victims, to remove intimate photos or videos shared online without victims’ consent. As part of its enforcement role, the FTC has launched TakeItDown.ftc.gov, a website allowing victims and survivors to submit complaints about platforms that have failed to act on valid requests for the removal of nonconsensual intimate images. The website also accepts complaints about platforms that have failed to create a process for people to request removal of these images. “Thanks t…
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance · General readers · Policy
News release
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance
Media advisory
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance
News release
Who should care: Lawyers · Privacy officers · Compliance